Los mecanismos de influencia en el liderazgo: dos estudios de caso


Autoria(s): Lancheros Guzman, David antonio; Zuluaga Lopez, Luis Felipe; Daza Rodriguez, Paola
Contribuinte(s)

Saavedra, Juan-Javier

Data(s)

03/06/2016

Resumo

Este trabajo investigativo busca aportar a la literatura sobre las tácticas de influencia en el liderazgo. Surge como una aplicación, a dos casos específicos, del proyecto de investigación “Los mecanismos de influencia en la relación de liderazgo”, desarrollado por el profesor Juan Javier Saavedra Mayorga e inscrito en la línea de investigación en Estudios Organizacionales del Grupo de Investigación en Dirección y Gerencia. La investigación tiene como objetivo fundamental identificar las tácticas de influencia que utilizan dos líderes organizacionales en su trato cotidiano con sus colaboradores, así como la reacción de estos últimos ante dichas tácticas. El proyecto parte de una revisión teórica sobre tres elementos: el liderazgo, la influencia y el poder, y las reacciones de los colaboradores frente a las tácticas de influencia utilizadas por el líder. La estrategia metodológica empleada es el estudio de caso. El trabajo de campo se desarrolló en dos organizaciones: Microscopios y Equipos Especiales S.A.S. y Tecniespectro S.A.S. La técnica de recolección de información es la entrevista semi estructurada, y el método de análisis de información es el análisis de contenido temático.

This research work is seeking to provide to the literature knowledge about the influence tactics of leadership. This investigation performs as an application of two specific cases, from the research project “The mechanism of influence in the leadership relationship”, developed by Professor Juan Javier Saavedra Mayorga and subscribed to the research line in Organizational studies, from the Research group in Management and leadership. The investigation has as a fundamental objective to identify the tactics of influence that are used by two organizational leaders in their daily relationship with their workers, as well as the workers reactions, after using the tactics before mentioned. The project starts from a theoretical revision about three elements: leadership, influence and power, and the reactions from employees against the influence tactics used by the leader. The methodologic strategy apply, is the study of the cases. The field work was developed in two organizations: Microscopios y Equipos Especiales S.A.S. y Tecniespectro S.A.S. The data collection technique is a semi structured interview; and the method of analysis of information is the analysis of the thematic content.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/12214

Idioma(s)

spa

Publicador

Facultad de administración

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Fonte

instname:Universidad del Rosario

reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR

Acevedo, A., & López, A. F. (1994). El proceso de la entrevista: conceptos y modelos. México: Limusa.

Bass, B., & Riggio, R. (2006). Transformational leadership. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Collinson, D. (2003). Identities and insecurities: selves at work. Organization, 10(3), 527-547.

Collinson, D. (2005). Dialectics of leadership. Human Relations, 58(11), 1419-1442.

Collinson, D. (2006). Rethinking followership: A post-structuralist analysis of follower identities. Leadership Quarterly(179-189).

Challef, I. (2003). The courageus follower. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler.

DuBrin, A. J. (2010). Leadership. Research findings, practice, and skills. United States: South Western CENGAGE learning.

Fulop, L., & Linstead, S. (2009). Power and politics in organizations. In S. Linstead, L. Fulop & S. Lilley (Eds.), Management and organization: a critical text. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Gaete, T., & Soto, Á. (2012). Esta es mi trayectoria, este es mi trabajo: narrativas e identidad en el trabajo en Chile. Psyche, 21(2), 47-59.

Graen, G. S., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leaderdhip over 25 years: Applying a multi- level, multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.

Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. (1982). Profiles of organizational influence strategies. San Diego, CA: University Associates.

Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(4), 440-452.

Klenke, K. (2008). Qualitative research in the study of leadership. UK: Emerald.

Kotter, J. (1977). Power, dependence, and effective management. Harvard Business Review, 55(4), 125-136.

Lord, R. G., & Brown, D. (2001). Leadership, values, and subordinate self-concepts. The Leadership Quarterly, 133-152.

Marion, R., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leadership in complex organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 12, 389-418.

Lussier, R. N., & Achua, C. E. (2002). Liderazgo. Teoría, aplicaciones y desarrollo de habilidades. México DF: International Thomson Editores.

Mumford, M. D. (Ed.). (2010). Leadership 101. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Northouse, P. (2007). Leadership. Theory and practice. London: Sage.

Pastor, J., & Ovejero, A. (2007). Michel Focault, caja de herramientas contra la dominación. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.

Rauch, C. F., & Behling, O. (1984). Functionalism. Basis for an alternate approach to the study of leadership. In G. Hunt, D. M. Hosking, C. Schriesheim & R. Stewart (Eds.), Leaders and manages: international perspectives on managerial behavior and leadership (pp. 45- 62). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

Sanabria, M., Saavedra, J. J., & Smida, A. (2014). Los estudios organizacionales (organization studies): fundamentos, evolución y estado actual del campo. Bogotá: Escuela de Administración, Universidad del Rosario.

Schriesheim, C., & Hinkin, T. (1990). Influence tactics used by subordinates: a theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the kipnis, schmidt, and wilkinson subscales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(3), 246-257.

Shamir, B. (2004). Motivation of followers. In G. Goethals, G. Sorenson & J. M. Burns (Eds.), Encyclopedia of leadership (pp. 499-504). London: Sage.

Tourish, D., Collinson, D., & Barker, J. (2009). Manufacturing conformity: leadership through coercive persuasion in business organisations. M@n@gement, 12(5), 360-383.

Yin, R. (2002). Case study research : design and method. London: Sage.

Yukl, G. (2008). How leaders influence organizational effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 708-722.

Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations (5 ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. (1990). Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 132-140.

Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. (1991). Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 416-423.

Yukl, G., Falbe, C., & Youn, J. Y. (1993). Patterns of influence behaviors for managers. Group and Organization Management, 18(1), 5-28.

Yukl, G., Seifert, C., & Chavez, C. (2008). Validation of the extended influence behavior questionnaire.

Yukl, G., & Tracey, B. (1992). Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(4), 525-535.

Yukl, G., & Van Fleet, D. (1992). Theory and research on leadership in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Zapata, Á., Murillo, G., & Martínez, J. (2006). Organización y Management. Naturaleza, objeto, método, investigación y enseñanza. Cali: Programa Editorial Universidad del Valle.

TA

Palavras-Chave #Liderazgo #Aptitud de mando #Poder (Ciencias sociales) #Empresas #658.4092 #Leadership #Power #Influence #Leader #Follower #Case study #Organization studies
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis

info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion