Identity crisis in identification evidence: Similarity judgments as an alternative to identification decisions.


Autoria(s): ZWARTZ, MICAIAH
Contribuinte(s)

Donald Thomson

Data(s)

01/02/2016

Resumo

This research explored similarity ratings as an alternative to identifications with regards to eyewitness evidence. This involved replacing the concept of binary identity decisions with continuum-based similarity judgments. Preliminary evidence suggested that a relationship exists between similarity and identity, and that ratings offer a number of advantages over identifications.

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30089085

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Deakin University, Faculty of Health, School of Psychology

Relação

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30089085/zwartz-agreement-2016.pdf

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30089085/zwartz-identitycrisis-2016A.pdf

Direitos

The author

Palavras-Chave #Forensic psychology #Justice #Crime #eyewitness testimony #Law reform #Court procedures
Tipo

Thesis