Identity crisis in identification evidence: Similarity judgments as an alternative to identification decisions.
Contribuinte(s) |
Donald Thomson |
---|---|
Data(s) |
01/02/2016
|
Resumo |
This research explored similarity ratings as an alternative to identifications with regards to eyewitness evidence. This involved replacing the concept of binary identity decisions with continuum-based similarity judgments. Preliminary evidence suggested that a relationship exists between similarity and identity, and that ratings offer a number of advantages over identifications. |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
Deakin University, Faculty of Health, School of Psychology |
Relação |
http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30089085/zwartz-agreement-2016.pdf http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30089085/zwartz-identitycrisis-2016A.pdf |
Direitos |
The author |
Palavras-Chave | #Forensic psychology #Justice #Crime #eyewitness testimony #Law reform #Court procedures |
Tipo |
Thesis |