A review of Australian approaches for monitoring, assessing and reporting estuarine condition: II. State and Territory programs


Autoria(s): Hallett, Chris S.; Valesini, Fiona; Scanes, Peter; Crawford, Christine; Gillanders, Bronwyn M.; Pope, Adam; Udy, James; Fortune, Julia; Townsend, Simon; Barton, Jan; Ye, Qifeng; Ross, D. Jeff; Martin, Kathryn; Glasby, Tim; Maxwell, Paul
Data(s)

01/12/2016

Resumo

In contrast to Europe, the USA and South Africa, Australia has no specific, overarching federal legislation to underpin a nationally-coordinated framework for monitoring, assessing and reporting estuarine condition. This has resulted in a complex mosaic of diverse approaches and governance structures, hindering the ability to make inter-State comparisons. In this second part of a comprehensive three-part review, we present a systematic appraisal of current and impending approaches for measuring and reporting estuarine condition in each of Australia's States and Territories. A concise summary is provided in each case, supported by extensive appendices containing detailed accounts of relevant monitoring and reporting programs. We synthesise and evaluate this output at the State/Territory level, highlighting areas of improvement and major gaps.

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30085504

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Elsevier

Relação

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30085504/pope-areviewofaustralian-2016.pdf

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30085504/pope-areviewofaustralian-inpress-2016.pdf

http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.013

Direitos

2016, Elsevier

Palavras-Chave #estuary #ecological status #health #monitoring #management #reporting
Tipo

Journal Article