A research agenda for design-based learning in engineering education


Autoria(s): Palmer, Stuart; Krishnan, Siva
Contribuinte(s)

Oo, Aman

Patil, Arun

Hilditch, Tim

Chandrasekaran, Siva

Data(s)

01/01/2015

Resumo

It is often argued that ‘design’ is an (perhaps the) essential characteristic of engineering practice; that, “Design requires unique knowledge, skills, and attitudes common to all engineering disciplines, and it is these attributes that distinguish engineering as a profession.” Hence, it is not surprising to see engineering design identified as a key element of engineering education. There are a range of pedagogical models described, badged with a range of names, that are suggested as approaches to teaching engineering design, for example: project-based learning, problem-based learning, design-based learning, conceive-design-implement-operate (CDIO), problem-oriented project-based learning, social design based learning and project-oriented, design-based learning. While significant literature on engineering design education generally exists, many authors note open questions regarding optimal pedagogical approaches, and opportunities for further evaluation and research. In this paper we draw on literature about design education and DBL in engineering education, and synthesise themes that present a potential research agenda for those educators involved in DBL in engineering education.A search of the research literature was conducted using terms related to DBL in engineering education, including ‘Engineering Design’, ‘Design Education’, ‘Engineering + Project Based Learning’, ‘Engineering + Problem Based Learning’ and ‘Engineering + Design Based Learning’. The literature thus collected was expanded by inspecting the lists of references in the initially identified literature set for further potentially relevant literature. This process was repeated until no further related literature was identified, and resulted in 124 items. All collected literature was carefully reviewed for explicitly identified suggestions for future research. The authors also considered the literature set as a whole to identify additional research possibilities implied by aspects of DBL practice commonly addressed weakly, or not at all, in the available published research. From the results of this review, a set of themes was synthesised by grouping related research recommendations and possibilities. In the following section the identified research themes are presented and, for each, a summary of the supporting literature is given and a central research question is formulated by the authors.

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30080219

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Australasian Association for Engineering Education

Relação

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30080219/palmer-aresearchagenda-2015.docx

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30080219/palmer-aresearchagenda-evid2-2015.pdf

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30080219/palmer-researchagenda-2015.pdf

Direitos

2015, The Authors

Palavras-Chave #design based learning #engineering education #literature review
Tipo

Conference Paper