Pulmonary vascular resistance: A meaningless variable?
| Data(s) |
01/01/2012
|
|---|---|
| Resumo |
Almost 20 years ago, Adriaan Versprille published an editorial in this journal to explain why, in his opinion, the calculation of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is meaningless [1]. The uncertainties of PVR were underscored a year later by McGregor and Sniderman in the American Journal of Cardiology [2]. Obviously, both papers failed to convince. A Medline search from 1985 to the end of 2002 reveals no less than 7,158 papers with PVR calculations. What is it that could be wrong in all this literature?. SCOPUS: ch.b info:eu-repo/semantics/published |
| Formato |
No full-text files |
| Identificador |
uri/info:doi/10.1007/978-3-642-28270-6_18 http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/230642 |
| Idioma(s) |
en |
| Palavras-Chave | #Physiologie générale |
| Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart info:ulb-repo/semantics/bookPart info:ulb-repo/semantics/openurl/bookitem |
