Heurystyka strachu. Czy ambiwalencja lęku może być dla nas pouczająca?


Autoria(s): Tibaldeo, Roberto Franzini
Contribuinte(s)

Nowak, Ewa

Huk, Marta Zuzanna

Data(s)

08/07/2016

08/07/2016

2015

Resumo

The paper assumes that fear presents a certain degree of ambivalence. To say it with Hans Jonas (1903-1993), fear is not only a negative emotion, but may teach us something very important: we recognize what is relevant when we perceive that it is at stake. Under this respect, fear may be assumed as a guide to responsibility, a virtue that is becoming increasingly important, because of the role played by human technology in the current ecological crisis. Secondly, fear and responsibility concern both dimensions of human action: private-individual and publiccollective. What the ‘heuristics of fear’ teaches us, is to become aware of a deeper ambivalence, namely the one which characterizes as such human freedom, which may aim to good or bad, to self-preservation or self-destruction. Any public discussion concerning political or economic issues related with human action (at an individual or collective level) ought not to leave this essential idea out of consideration.

4

1

68

86

4

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna

Identificador

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2015, Tom 4, Nr 1, pp. 68-86.

2299-1875

http://hdl.handle.net/10593/14792

10.14746/fped.2015.4.1.4

Idioma(s)

pol

Publicador

Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Filozofii UAM

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Palavras-Chave #Responsibility #heuristics of fear #technological risks #Hans Jonas
Tipo

Artykuł