Heurystyka strachu. Czy ambiwalencja lęku może być dla nas pouczająca?
Contribuinte(s) |
Nowak, Ewa Huk, Marta Zuzanna |
---|---|
Data(s) |
08/07/2016
08/07/2016
2015
|
Resumo |
The paper assumes that fear presents a certain degree of ambivalence. To say it with Hans Jonas (1903-1993), fear is not only a negative emotion, but may teach us something very important: we recognize what is relevant when we perceive that it is at stake. Under this respect, fear may be assumed as a guide to responsibility, a virtue that is becoming increasingly important, because of the role played by human technology in the current ecological crisis. Secondly, fear and responsibility concern both dimensions of human action: private-individual and publiccollective. What the ‘heuristics of fear’ teaches us, is to become aware of a deeper ambivalence, namely the one which characterizes as such human freedom, which may aim to good or bad, to self-preservation or self-destruction. Any public discussion concerning political or economic issues related with human action (at an individual or collective level) ought not to leave this essential idea out of consideration. 4 1 68 86 4 Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna |
Identificador |
Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2015, Tom 4, Nr 1, pp. 68-86. 2299-1875 http://hdl.handle.net/10593/14792 10.14746/fped.2015.4.1.4 |
Idioma(s) |
pol |
Publicador |
Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Filozofii UAM |
Direitos |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Palavras-Chave | #Responsibility #heuristics of fear #technological risks #Hans Jonas |
Tipo |
Artykuł |