The aporetics of religious diversity
Data(s) |
2016
|
---|---|
Resumo |
My thesis situates itself within the field of the Philosophy of Worldviews. Specifically, it aims to address the normative question of what the task should be of such a philosophy when faced with the problem of conflicting beliefs between religious worldviews. To answer this question, I turn to the procedure of aporetical analysis, in short, aporetics. Firstly, aporetics offers a distinct method of consistency restoration within inconsistent sets on the basis of thesis rejection and thesis modification. Secondly, aporetics leads to an understanding of the availability of aporetic exits on the basis of epistemic criteria. On the one hand, this leads us to opt for an orientational monism/pluralism, which steers the middle course between the epistemic stances of exclusivism and pluralism. On the other hand, it allows us to identify epistemic criteria for worldview acquisition on the basis of three distinct superclasses. These superclasses can be derived from Jürgen Habermas' validity claims, and applied to the self-understanding of contemporary theories of religion. |
Formato |
|
Identificador |
http://theses.gla.ac.uk/7469/1/2016DrieghePhd.pdf Drieghe, Geert (2016) The aporetics of religious diversity. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow. |
Idioma(s) |
en |
Relação |
http://theses.gla.ac.uk/7469/ http://encore.lib.gla.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3173183 |
Palavras-Chave | #B Philosophy (General) |
Tipo |
Thesis NonPeerReviewed |