The dangers of theorizing before analysis : four case studies about argumentation and cognition
| Contribuinte(s) |
Interactions, Corpus, Apprentissages, Représentations (ICAR) ; École normale supérieure - Lyon (ENS Lyon) - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 (UL2) - INRP - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) - Ecole Normale Supérieure Lettres et Sciences Humaines |
|---|---|
| Cobertura |
Paris, France |
| Data(s) |
07/07/2014
|
| Resumo |
International audience In this talk, we briefly compare and contrast two research traditions: the hypothetico-deductive and the ethnomethodological. We will present three case studies from our own research that mostly exemplify the hypothetico-deductive tradition.We will illustrate with these case studies three different dangers of theorizing before analysis and how we saved ourselves from these dangers. |
| Identificador |
halshs-01392574 |
| Idioma(s) |
en |
| Publicador |
HAL CCSD |
| Fonte |
Empirical Approaches to Argumentation https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01392574 Empirical Approaches to Argumentation, Jul 2014, Paris, France |
| Palavras-Chave | #Argumentation #Cognition #Ethnomethodology #experimental approach #[SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences |
| Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject Conference papers |
