Constructivism, constitutionalism and the EU's area of freedom security and justice post-Lisbon


Autoria(s): O'Neill, Maria
Contribuinte(s)

Abertay University. Dundee Business School

Data(s)

16/08/2016

16/08/2016

30/06/2016

31/03/2016

Resumo

This essay addresses the fundamental conceptual challenges which face the development of the Area of Freedom Security and Justice (AFSJ) in the post-Lisbon Treaty era. It argues that Onuf style constructivism is a valid lens with which to examine the development of the AFSJ to date, involving as it does the development of a shared understanding by practitioners, predominantly law enforcement and prosecution professionals, within the structures provided for them, in order to develop a completely new area of law and practice. While this approach will continue to need to be deployed in the development of further new operational areas, such as cybercrime, a new approach is now required, that of constitutionalism. A variety of forms of constitutionalism are then examined in order to establish their suitability as a mode of analysis for these developments.

Identificador

O'Neill, M. 2016. Constructivism, constitutionalism and the EU's area of freedom security and justice post-Lisbon. European Law Review. 41(3).

0307-5400

http://hdl.handle.net/10373/2418

Idioma(s)

en

Publicador

Sweet and Maxwell

Relação

European Law Review, 41(3)

Direitos

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is the author accepted version of the manuscript, © 2016 Sweet and Maxwell, which is under embargo until; 30th June 2017. The full version is available from: http://legalresearch.westlaw.co.uk/ or http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/our-businesses/docdel.aspx

Tipo

Journal Article

published

peer-reviewed

accepted