Constructivism, constitutionalism and the EU's area of freedom security and justice post-Lisbon
Contribuinte(s) |
Abertay University. Dundee Business School |
---|---|
Data(s) |
16/08/2016
16/08/2016
30/06/2016
31/03/2016
|
Resumo |
This essay addresses the fundamental conceptual challenges which face the development of the Area of Freedom Security and Justice (AFSJ) in the post-Lisbon Treaty era. It argues that Onuf style constructivism is a valid lens with which to examine the development of the AFSJ to date, involving as it does the development of a shared understanding by practitioners, predominantly law enforcement and prosecution professionals, within the structures provided for them, in order to develop a completely new area of law and practice. While this approach will continue to need to be deployed in the development of further new operational areas, such as cybercrime, a new approach is now required, that of constitutionalism. A variety of forms of constitutionalism are then examined in order to establish their suitability as a mode of analysis for these developments. |
Identificador |
O'Neill, M. 2016. Constructivism, constitutionalism and the EU's area of freedom security and justice post-Lisbon. European Law Review. 41(3). 0307-5400 |
Idioma(s) |
en |
Publicador |
Sweet and Maxwell |
Relação |
European Law Review, 41(3) |
Direitos |
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is the author accepted version of the manuscript, © 2016 Sweet and Maxwell, which is under embargo until; 30th June 2017. The full version is available from: http://legalresearch.westlaw.co.uk/ or http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/our-businesses/docdel.aspx |
Tipo |
Journal Article published peer-reviewed accepted |