Do GPs and psychiatrists recommend alternatives when prescribing anti-depressants?


Autoria(s): Read, John; Gibson, Kerry; Cartwright, Claire
Data(s)

31/10/2016

Resumo

This study explores whether a partial explanation for high antidepressant prescription rates is the failure of prescribers to recommend alternatives. 1,829 New Zealand adults were asked which of six non-pharmacological treatment approaches were recommended when prescribed anti-depressants. The majority (82%) received at least one recommendation and 32% received three or more, most commonly ‘Counsellor/Psychologist/Psychotherapist’ (74%) and Exercise Schedule (43%). It cannot, therefore, be concluded that failing to consider non-pharmacological treatments is a major cause of high prescribing rates. Being younger and more severely depressed were both positively related to number of recommendations. Psychiatrists made significantly more recommendations than GPs.

Formato

text

Identificador

http://roar.uel.ac.uk/5337/1/Read%20et%20al.%20%282016%29%20Non-medical%20recommendations%20to%20antidpressants%20recipients.pdf

Read, John and Gibson, Kerry and Cartwright, Claire (2016) ‘Do GPs and psychiatrists recommend alternatives when prescribing anti-depressants?’, Psychiatry Research, 246(Dec.), pp. 838-840. (10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.069 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.069>).

Publicador

Elsevier

Relação

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.069

http://roar.uel.ac.uk/5337/

Tipo

Article

PeerReviewed