A comparative study of approaches to audiovisual translation
Data(s) |
2016
|
---|---|
Resumo |
For those who are not new to the world of Japanese animation, known mainly as anime, the debate of "dub vs. sub" is by no means anything out of the ordinary, but rather a very heated argument amongst fans. The study will focus on the differences in the US English version between the two approaches of translating audio-visual media, namely subtitling (official subtitles and fanmade subtitles) and dubbing, in a qualitative context. More precisely, which of the two approaches can store the most information from the same audiovisual segment, in order to satisfy the needs of the anime audience. In order to draw substantial conclusions, the analysis will be conducted on a corpus of 1 episode from the first season of the popular mid-nineties TV animated series, Sailor Moon. The main objective of this research is to analyze the three versions and compare the findings to what anime fans expect each of them to provide, in terms of how culture specific terms are handled, how accurate the translation is, localization, censorship, and omission. As for the fans’ opinions, the study will include a survey regarding the personal preference of fans when it comes to choosing between the official subtitled version, the fanmade subtitles and the dubbed version. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
Högskolan Dalarna, Japanska |
Direitos |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Palavras-Chave | #audiovisual translation #subtitling #dubbing #translation quality #anime #Specific Languages #Studier av enskilda språk |
Tipo |
Student thesis info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis text |