Feasibility, normative heuristics and the proper place of historical responsibility – a reply to Ohndorf et al.


Autoria(s): Schuppert, Fabian; Seidel, Christian
Data(s)

21/09/2016

31/12/1969

Resumo

In this comment, we pick up three points raised by Ohndorf et al. (2015) in their reply to our ethical assessment of the German Advisory Council’s Budget Approach (WBGUBA). First, we discuss and clarify the relationship between ethics and political feasibility, highlighting that the way Ohndorf et el. use feasibility creates an unwarranted status quo bias. Second, we explain the proper place historical responsibility should have within the WBGUBA, stressing the fact that the reasons why we choose one policy proposal over another matter. Third, we analyze the limited extent to which a normative heuristic should motivate an ethically ambitious policy proposal like the WBGUBA.

Identificador

http://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/feasibility-normative-heuristics-and-the-proper-place-of-historical-responsibility--a-reply-to-ohndorf-et-al(867db7c4-939e-4352-a7c4-31a7a1a8a7f0).html

Idioma(s)

eng

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess

Fonte

Schuppert , F & Seidel , C 2016 , ' Feasibility, normative heuristics and the proper place of historical responsibility – a reply to Ohndorf et al. ' Climatic Change .

Tipo

article