Commentary on Jeffreys v. Boosey (1854)


Autoria(s): Deazley, Ronan
Contribuinte(s)

Bently, Lionel

Kretschmer, Martin

Data(s)

2008

Resumo

The second decision of the House of Lords to consider the nature of copyright law. As was the case in Donaldson v. Becket (1774) (uk_1774) the law lords were in disagreement with the majority of common law judges invited to speak to the issue for the consideration of the House. In the course of their opinions, two of the law lords (Lord Brougham and Lord St Leonards) explicitly reject the concept of copyright at common law. Rather than a natural authorial property right, they present copyright as a purely statutory phenomenon specifically grounded in public interest concerns. Ultimately, the Lords decided that a foreign national, resident abroad, but first publishing in Britain, enjoys no protection in his work under British copyright law.<br/>

Identificador

http://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/commentary-on-jeffreys-v-boosey-1854(d1da2e73-331f-404b-b26f-178823c0b08c).html

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

University of Cambridge

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Fonte

Deazley , R , Bently , L (ed.) & Kretschmer , M (ed.) Commentary on Jeffreys v. Boosey (1854) .

Palavras-Chave #copyright history
Tipo

other