Commentary on Bach v. Longman (1777)


Autoria(s): Deazley, Ronan
Contribuinte(s)

Kretschmer, Martin

Bently, Lionel

Data(s)

2008

Resumo

A case, initiated by two composers, Johann Christian Bach and Karl Friedrich Abel, concerning whether or not printed music fell within the protection of the Statute of Anne 1710 (uk_1710). Lord Mansfield holds that published music is protected as ‘writing' within the terms of the legislation.<br/>The commentary explores attitudes to the protection of music throughout the eighteenth century on the part of publishers, composers and musicians, and in particular the use of the printing privilege by some composers to secure the right to publish their work, and the efforts of the music publishers to secure legislative protection in the mid-eighteenth century.<br/>

Identificador

http://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/commentary-on-bach-v-longman-1777(e39aa645-dc8a-4b68-948e-67c791c6a2cd).html

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

University of Cambridge

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Fonte

Deazley , R , Kretschmer , M (ed.) & Bently , L (ed.) Commentary on Bach v. Longman (1777) .

Palavras-Chave #copyright history
Tipo

other