Commentary on the Booksellers' Bill (1737)


Autoria(s): Deazley, Ronan
Contribuinte(s)

Kretschmer, Martin

Bently, Lionel

Data(s)

2008

Resumo

This Bill marks the first occasion on which the British legislature proposed to confer upon authors a lifetime interest in their literary works (with an additional eleven year post-mortem term vesting in their estates), as well as limited rights of translation and abridgement. In addition the draft legislation proposed to render null and void any contract purporting to assign an author's rights to another for a period of longer than ten years.<br/>The commentary describes the background to the Bill, and in particular the attempts of the London book trade to secure more extensive legislative protection in both 1735 and 1737. It argues that the 1737 Bill is significant precisely because it was never made into law, and because it did not suit the best interests of the metropolitan booksellers. Instead, the book trade increasingly turned to the courts to further secure their commercial interests, giving rise to what is commonly referred to as the ‘battle of the booksellers' throughout the next 40 years.<br/>

Identificador

http://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/commentary-on-the-booksellers-bill-1737(fac006c2-dd59-4cf9-aff3-4b0c78ccc22e).html

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

University of Cambridge

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Fonte

Deazley , R , Kretschmer , M (ed.) & Bently , L (ed.) Commentary on the Booksellers' Bill (1737) .

Palavras-Chave #copyright history
Tipo

other