Of two contrasting philosophies that underpin openness in education and what that entails


Autoria(s): Sloep, Peter; Schuwer, Robert
Data(s)

10/10/2016

10/10/2016

01/10/2016

Resumo

From the conclusion: The ultimate question is a normative one: Which way do we want that openness in education to go? That question concerns educational resources, open educational practices and what other forms the educational system may spawn. For ultimately, we as stakeholders, in the learning of our children and grandchildren, in the professional development and Bildung of ourselves, should get the educational systems that we want, including appropriate forms of openness therein. Every individual then should decide for herself or himself to what extent this requires education as a public good and to what extent education as a private good, that is, as a commodity subject to market forces. It should not come as a surprise that we side with the humanitarian elaboration of openness. Indeed, we feel that governments as guardians of the public space should actively get involved in promoting this kind of openness, indeed, much as Delors in 1996 advocated for education as a whole.

Identificador

Sloep, P. B., & Schuwer, R. (2016). Of two contrasting philosophies that underpin openness in education and what that entails. In M. Deimann & M. A. Peters (Eds.), The Philosophy and Theory of Open Education (p. xx-yy). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

http://hdl.handle.net/1820/7093

Idioma(s)

en

Publicador

Peter Lang Publishing

Palavras-Chave #MOOC #Open Educational Resources #Open University
Tipo

Book chapter