La carpeta de aprendizaje y la evaluación entre iguales de los estudiantes. Resultados de una innovación docente en los estudios universitarios de las artes


Autoria(s): Menéndez-Varela, José Luis; Universidad de Barcelona; Gregori-Giralt, Eva; Universidad de Barcelona
Contribuinte(s)

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad y los fondos FEDER [HAR2013-46608-R]

Vicerrectorado de Política Docente y el Programa de Mejora e Innovación Docente de la Universidad de Barcelona [GIDCUB-13/103]

Data(s)

07/09/2016

Resumo

Students reflect more on their learning in course subjects when they participate in managing their teaching–learning environment. As a form of guided participation, peer assessment serves the following purposes: (a) it improves the student’s understanding of previously established learning objectives; (b) it is a powerful metacognitive tool; (c) it transfers to the student part of the responsibility for assessing learning, which means deciding which learning activities are important and choosing the degree of effort a course subject will require; (d) it emphasizes the collective aspect of the nature of knowledge; and (e) the educational benefits derived from peer assessment clearly justify the efforts required to implement activities. This paper reports on the relative merits of a learning portfolio compiled during fine arts-related studies in which peer assessment played an important role. The researchers analyzed the student work load and the final marks students received for compulsory art subjects. They conclude that the use of a closed learning portfolio with a well-structured, sequential and analytical design can have a positive effect on student learning and that, although implementing peer assessment may be complex and students need to become familiar with it, its use is not only feasible but recommendable.

Uno de los factores que favorecen la reflexión de los estudiantes sobre su aprendizaje es su participación guiada en la gestión de los entornos didácticos de las asignaturas. A este respecto, la evaluación entre iguales es un recurso de interés por las razones siguientes: (a) porque mejora la comprensión de los objetivos de aprendizaje; (b) porque exige procesos de alto nivel cognitivo; (c) porque traslada al estudiante parte de la responsabilidad de la evaluación, que determina el tipo de aprendizajes considerados importantes y el esfuerzo dedicado a la asignatura; (d) porque enfatiza la dimensión colectiva del conocimiento; y (e) porque supone una buena ratio entre beneficios educativos y recursos necesarios para su implantación. Esta investigación examina la adecuación de una carpeta de aprendizaje, en la que la evaluación entre iguales tuvo un lugar destacado, al contexto educativo de las artes. Se analizaron la carga de trabajo y las calificaciones finales de estudiantes de asignaturas obligatorias de arte. El estudio permite concluir los efectos positivos de una carpeta cerrada, estructurada, secuencial y analítica; y que la incorporación de una actividad compleja y poco familiar para los estudiantes como es la evaluación entre iguales no solo es posible sino recomendable.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ARIS/article/view/50356

10.5209/rev_ARIS.2016.v28.n3.50356

Publicador

Ediciones Complutense

Relação

http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ARIS/article/view/50356/48963

/*ref*/Admiraal, W., Hoeksma, M., van de Kamp, M.-T. y van Duin, G. (2011). Assessment of Teacher Competence Using Video Portfolios: Reliability, Construct Validity, and Consequential Validity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1019-1028.

/*ref*/Baeten, M., Dochy, F. y Struyven, K. (2008). Students’ Approaches to Learning and Assessment Preferences in a Portfolio-Based Learning Environment. Instructional Science: an International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 36(5-6), 359-374.

/*ref*/Baume, D. y Yorke, M. (2000). Validity and Reliability in the Evaluation of Portfolios for the Accreditation of Teachers in Higher Education. American Association for Higher Education Assessment Forum. 17, 1-13.

/*ref*/Beausaert, S., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2011). The Personal Development Plan Practice Questionnaire: the development and validation of an instrument to assess the employee’s perception of personal development plan practice. International Journal of Training and Development, 15(4), 249-270.

/*ref*/Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (2nd ed.). Buckingham; Philadelphia, PA: Society for Research into Higher Education; Open University Press.

/*ref*/Conrad, D. (2008). Building knowledge through portfolio learning in prior learning assessment and recognition. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(2), 139-150.

/*ref*/Driessen, E. W., van Tartwijk, J., Vermunt, J. D. y van der Vleuten, C. P. (2003). Use of Portfolios in Early Undergraduate Medical Training. Medical Teacher, 25(1), 18-23.

/*ref*/Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment: Introduction to the special issue. Higher Education, 22(3), 201-204.

/*ref*/Gannon, F. T., Draper, P. R., Watson, R., Proctor, S. y Norman, I. J. (2001). Putting portfolios in their place. Nurse Education Today, 21(7), 534-540

/*ref*/Garrett, N. (2011). An Eportfolio Design Supporting Ownership, Social Learning, and Ease of Use. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 187-202.

/*ref*/Gearhart, M., Herman, J. L., Novak, J. R. y Wolf, S. A. (1995). Toward the Instructional Utility of Large-Scale Writing Assessment: Validation of a New Narrative Rubric. Assessing Writing, 2(2), 207-242.

/*ref*/Graham, M. A. y Sims-Gunzenhauser, A. (2009). Advanced Placement in Studio Art and Secondary Art Education Policy: Countering the Null Curriculum. Arts Education Policy Review, 110(3), 18-24.

/*ref*/Himbeault, S. (2011). Engendering Habits of Mind and Heart through Integrative Learning. About Campus, 16(5), 13-20.

/*ref*/Jones, E. (2010). Personal Theory and Reflection in a Professional Practice Portfolio. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(6), 699-710.

/*ref*/Kicken, W., Brand-Gruwel, S, van Merriënboer, J. y Slot, W. (2009). Design and evaluation of a development portfolio: how to improve students’ self-directed learning skills. Instructional Science, 37(5), 453-473.

/*ref*/Knight, W. E., Hakel, M. D. y Gromko, M. (2008). The Relationship between Electronic Portfolio Participation and Student Success. Professional File. Association for Institutional Research, 107, 1-16.

/*ref*/Menéndez Varela, J. L. (2009). La aplicación del sistema europeo de transferencia y acumulación de créditos. Consideraciones sobre la noción de carga de trabajo y los procedimientos de cálculo. Revista Complutense de Educación, 20(2), 381- 401.

/*ref*/Messick, S. (1990). Validity of test interpretation and use. Advance online publication. Recuperado de: http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED395031.pdf

/*ref*/Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.

/*ref*/Messick, S. (1995a). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(4), 5-8.

/*ref*/Messick, S. (1995b). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749.

/*ref*/Moskal, B. M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: what, when and how? Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(3), 22-29.

/*ref*/Orzoff, J. H., Peinovich, P. E. y Riedel, E. (2008). Graduate Programs: The Wild West of Outcomes Assessment. Assessment UpDate, 20(3), 1-15.

/*ref*/O’Sullivan, P., Reckase, M. D., McClain, T., Savidge, M. A. y Clardy, J. A. (2004). Demonstration of Portfolios to Assess Competency of Residents. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 9(4), 309-323.

/*ref*/Paratore, J. R. (1995). Assessing literacy: Establishing common standards in portfolio assessment. Topics in Language Disorders, 16(1), 67-82.

/*ref*/Peacock, S., Gordon, L. Murray, S., Morss, K. y Dunlop, G. (2010). Tutor Response to Implementing an ePortfolio to Support Learning and Personal Development in Further and Higher Education Institutions in Scotland. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 827-851.

/*ref*/Romova, Z. y Andrew, M. (2011). Teaching and Assessing Academic Writing via the Portfolio: Benefits for Learners of English as an Additional Language. Assessing Writing, 16(2), 111-122.

/*ref*/Shapley, K. S. y Bush, J. (1999). Developing a Valid and Reliable Portfolio Assessment in the Primary Grades: Building on Practical Experience. Applied Measurement in Education, 12(2), 111-132.

/*ref*/Sithole, B. M. (2011). Portfolio Assessment of Teaching Practice: Views from Business Education In-Service Student Teachers in Botswana. US-China Education Review, 4, 523-531.

/*ref*/Smith, K. y Tillema, H. (2001). Long-term influences of portfolios on professional development. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(2), 183-203

/*ref*/Tillema, H., y Smith, K. (2007). Portfolio Appraisal: In Search of Criteria. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 23(4), 442-456.

/*ref*/Van Tartwijk, J., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C. y Stokking, K. (2007). Factors influencing the successful introduction of portfolios. Quality in Higher Education, 13(1), 69-79.

/*ref*/Wilkinson, T. J., Challis, M., Hobma, S. O., Newble, D. I., Parboosingh, J. T., Sibbald, R. G. y Wakeford, R. (2002). The Use of Portfolios for Assessment of the Competence and Performance of Doctors in Practice. Medical Education, 36(10), 918-924.

http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ARIS/article/downloadSuppFile/50356/2773

http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ARIS/article/downloadSuppFile/50356/2774

http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ARIS/article/downloadSuppFile/50356/2775

http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ARIS/article/downloadSuppFile/50356/2776

http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ARIS/article/downloadSuppFile/50356/2777

http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ARIS/article/downloadSuppFile/50356/2778

Direitos

LICENCIA DE USO: Los artículos a texto completo incluidos en el Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de los artículos del Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses debe efectuarse a la URL oficial de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

LICENCE OF USE: The full text articles included on the Scientific Journals of the Complutense website are open access and the property of their authors and/or publishers. Therefore, any reproduction, distribution, public communication and/or total or partial transformation requires their express and written consent. Links to the full text of the articles on the Scientific Journals of the Complutense website should be to the official URL of the Complutense University of Madrid.

Fonte

Arte, Individuo y Sociedad; Vol 28, No 3 (2016); 515-531

Palavras-Chave #Humanidades > Bellas Artes #carpeta de aprendizaje; educación superior; evaluación entre iguales; Bellas Artes #learning portfolio; higher education; peer assessment; Fine Arts
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

Artículo revisado por pares

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion