Governmentality gone wild: How the separation of sex workers from 'communities' contributes to violence against sex workers


Autoria(s): Lonergan, Megan
Contribuinte(s)

Queen's University (Kingston, Ont.). Theses (Queen's University (Kingston, Ont.))

Data(s)

24/07/2016

28/07/2016

02/08/2016

02/08/2016

02/08/2016

Resumo

Sex workers are members of our communities, whether they are local or national communities. In law, mainstream media representations, and research sex workers are positioned as outside of or in opposition to communities. Even within marginalized communities sex workers are excluded when appeals to respectability politics are made. In this thesis I analyze three analytic sites from three areas of social life. The first chapter performs a textual analysis of The Bedford Decision (2013) and the resulting Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act (2014) as an examination of law. The second chapter is an analysis of filmic discourse on community, sex workers, and violence in the mainstream film London Road (2015) as an examination of mainstream media. The third chapter draws upon empirical research, i.e. in-depth interviews with three current and former sex workers in Ottawa, Canada and analyzes the transcripts using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to center how sex workers’ understanding of their work, community, and the laws and policies that are supposed govern and protect them. In my preface and conclusion I discuss some of the ethical dilemmas I encountered while conducting this research. My findings suggest that sex workers are being positioned and understood as outside of communities in ways that contribute to violence against sex workers. The implications of this research suggest that people who speak in the name of communities—communities in the sense of local neighborhood communities, activist communities, and national communities—need to recognize that sex workers are part of their communities and be accountable to ensuring they are treated as members. Researchers who conduct research on sex work and sex workers need to be accountable to their participants and the impacts their research may have on laws and policies. Sex workers are an over-researched population yet their voices are largely misappropriated or silenced in popular research and policy debates.

Thesis (Master, Gender Studies) -- Queen's University, 2016-07-28 15:42:31.602

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/1974/14681

Idioma(s)

en

en

Relação

Canadian theses

Direitos

Queen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canada

ProQuest PhD and Master's Theses International Dissemination Agreement

Intellectual Property Guidelines at Queen's University

Copying and Preserving Your Thesis

Creative Commons - Attribution - CC BY

This publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.

This publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.

Palavras-Chave #sex workers' rights, missing and murdered, settler colonialism, law and legal studies #sex work, Canada, governmentality, community, Ottawa, violence, feminism, IPA
Tipo

Thesis