Should non-euro area countries join the single supervisory mechanism?
Data(s) |
2013
|
---|---|
Resumo |
Highlights - Irrespective of the euro crisis, a European banking union makes sense, including for non-euro area countries, because of the extent of European Union financial integration. The Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) is the first element of the banking union. - From the point of view of non-euro countries, the draft SSM regulation as amended by the EU Council includes strong safeguards relating to decision-making, accountability, attention to financial stability in small countries and the applicability of national macro-prudential measures. Non-euro countries will also have the right to leave the SSM and thereby exempt themselves from a supervisory decision. - The SSM by itself cannot bring the full benefits of the banking union, but would foster financial integration, improve the supervision of cross-border banks, ensure greater consistency of supervisory practices, increase the quality of supervision, avoid competitive distortions and provide ample supervisory information. - While the decision to join the SSM is made difficult by the uncertainty about other elements of the banking union, including the possible burden sharing, we conclude that non-euro EU members should stand ready to join the SSM and be prepared for the negotiations of the other elements of the banking union. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador |
http://unipub.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/2434/1/wp_2013_5_Darvas_Wolff.pdf Darvas, Zsolt and Wolff, Guntram B. (2013) Should non-euro area countries join the single supervisory mechanism? Working Paper. Department of Mathematical Economics and Economic Analysis, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest. |
Publicador |
Department of Mathematical Economics and Economic Analysis, Corvinus University of Budapest |
Relação |
http://unipub.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/2434/ |
Palavras-Chave | #Economic policy #International economics #Finance |
Tipo |
Monograph NonPeerReviewed |