Good and bad institutions:is the debate over? Cross-country firm-level evidence from the textile industry


Autoria(s): Bhaumik, Sumon Kumar; Dimova, Ralitza
Data(s)

2014

Resumo

Using firm-level data from nine developing countries, we demonstrate that certain institutions, like restrictive labour market regulations, that are considered bad for economic growth might be beneficial for production efficiency, whereas good business environment, which is considered beneficial for economic growth, might have an adverse impact on production efficiency. We argue that our results suggest that there might be significant difference in the macro- and micro-impacts of institutional quality, such that the classification of institutions into 'good' and 'bad might be premature. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.aston.ac.uk/24966/1/Cross_country_firm_level_evidence_from_the_textile_industry.pdf

Bhaumik, Sumon Kumar and Dimova, Ralitza (2014). Good and bad institutions:is the debate over? Cross-country firm-level evidence from the textile industry. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38 (1), pp. 109-126.

Relação

http://eprints.aston.ac.uk/24966/

Tipo

Article

PeerReviewed