Community broadcasting and the enclosure of the public sphere
Contribuinte(s) |
R. Boyle J. Corner N. Garnham et al. |
---|---|
Data(s) |
01/05/2006
|
Resumo |
One of the normative tenets of the Habermasian public sphere is that it should be an open and universally accessible forum. In Australia, one way of achieving this is the provision for community broadcasting in the Broadcasting Services Act. A closer examination of community broadcasting, however, suggests practices that contradict the idea of an open and accessible public sphere. Community broadcasting organizations regulate access to their media assets through a combination of formal and informal structures. This suggests that the public sphere can be understood as a resource, and that community broadcasting organizations can be analysed as ‘commons regimes’. This approach reveals a fundamental paradox inherent in the public sphere: access, participation and the quality of discourse in the public sphere are connected to its enclosure, which limits membership and participation through a system of rules and norms that govern the conduct of a group. By accepting the view that a public sphere is governed by property rights, it follows that an open and universally accessible public sphere is neither possible nor desirable. |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
Sage Publications |
Palavras-Chave | #access #commons #participation #radio #third sector #C1 #400104 Communication and Media Studies #751004 The media |
Tipo |
Journal Article |