Effective assertive behavior in the workplace: Responding to unfair criticism


Autoria(s): Wilson, K. L.; Lizzio, A. J.; Whicker, L.; Gallois, C.; Price, J.
Contribuinte(s)

A. Baum

Data(s)

01/01/2003

Resumo

A social rules perspective was employed to identify the elements of socially appropriate responses to unfair criticism in the workplace. Women generally endorsed for themselves response strategies based on stronger obligation and softer rights components, while men endorsed responses based on stronger personal rights expression and weaker obligation components. In support of the utility of a social rules approach to operationalizing context-specific expectations, behavioral responses based on gender and status-specific rules were evaluated as more effective on task, relationship, and self-respect dimensions than were rights-only, rights-plus-empathy, or submissive strategies. Results are discussed in terms of the development of a context-specific model of interpersonal competence and implications for interpersonal skills and assertion training.

Identificador

http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:74516

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Belwether

Palavras-Chave #Psychology, Social #Influence Tactics #Gender Differences #Influence Strategies #Impact #Performance #Leadership #Sex #Metaanalysis #Determinants #Perceptions #C1 #380108 Industrial and Organisational Psychology #780108 Behavioural and cognitive sciences
Tipo

Journal Article