Should we be evaluating the ventricle or the myocardium? Advances in tissue characterization

The assessment of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction has become the most frequent indication for echocardiography, a growth that has been driven by the epidemic of heart failure. The value of echocardiography for assessing LV dysfunction is unquestionable, the quantification of both LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction being a reliable indicator of mortality. 1,2 Nonetheless, whereas the ejection fraction and diastolic assessment are important clinical parameters, they are highly dependent on loading and may produce abnormal results under unusual loading conditions. Moreover, in a number of situations where the LV is evaluated, although the overall function is an important finding, the referring clinician is really requesting an assessment of the nature of the underlying myocardial tissue (Table 1). Indeed, in some situations (eg, among family members of patients with a cardiomyopathy) questions arise about the presence of pathology despite the presence of normal ventricular function. Traditionally, it has been difficult to obtain this information because of the lack of sufficiently sensitive parameters, but a number of new developments have shown such success in this area that the clinical application of tools to assess the myocardium in routine practice appears finally to be a realistic proposition.