A comparison of competing methods for the detection of surgical-site infections in patients undergoing total arthroplasty of the knee, partial and total arthroplasty of hip and femoral or similar vascular bypass


Autoria(s): Curtis, M.; Graves, N.; Birrell, F.; Walker, S.; Henderson, B.; Shaw, M.
Contribuinte(s)

S. Barrett

Data(s)

01/01/2004

Resumo

Recent research suggests that the retrospective review of the International Classification of Disease (ICD-9-CM) codes assigned to a patient episode will identify a similar number of healthcare-acquired surgical-site infections as compared with prospective surveillance by infection control practitioners (ICP). We tested this finding by replicating the methods for 380 surgical procedures. The sensitivity and specificity of the ICP undertaking prospective surveillance was 80% and 100%, and the sensitivity and specificity of the review of ICD-10-AM codes was 60% and 98.9%. Based on these results we do not support retrospective review of ICD-10-AM codes in preference prospective surveillance for SSI. (C) 2004 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Identificador

http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:69963

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Elsevier Ltd

Palavras-Chave #Infectious Diseases #Surgical-site Infection #Surveillance #Icd-10-am #C1 #321010 Infectious Diseases #730101 Infectious diseases
Tipo

Journal Article