The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration


Autoria(s): Bossuyt, P. M.; Reitsma, J. B.; Bruns, D. E.; Gatsonis, C. A.; Glasziou, P. P.; Irwig, L. M.; Moher, D.; Rennie, D.; de Vet, H. C. W.; Lijmer, J. G.
Contribuinte(s)

D. E. Bruns

Data(s)

01/01/2003

Resumo

The quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal. Complete and accurate reporting is necessary to enable readers to assess the potential for bias in the study and to evaluate the generalisability of the results. A group of scientists and editors has developed the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) statement to improve the reporting the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The statement consists of a checklist of 25 items and flow diagram that authors can use to ensure that all relevant information is present. This explanatory document aims to facilitate the use, understanding and dissemination of the checklist. The document contains a clarification of the meaning, rationale and optimal use of each item on the checklist, as well as a short summary of the available evidence on bias and applicability. The STARD statement, checklist, flowchart and this explanation and elaboration document should be useful resources to improve reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Complete and informative reporting can only lead to better decisions in healthcare.

Identificador

http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:67850

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

Palavras-Chave #Medical Laboratory Technology #Coronary-artery-disease #Fine-needle Aspiration #Medical Literature #Verification Bias #Pulmonary-embolism #Selection Bias #Bayes Theorem #Spectrum Bias #Users Guides #D-dimer #C1 #321203 Health Information Systems (incl. Surveillance) #730305 Diagnostic methods
Tipo

Journal Article