The (In)visibility of Psychodiagnosticians' Expertise


Autoria(s): Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael; Spaanjaars, Nano; Witteman, Cilia
Data(s)

2015

Resumo

This study investigates decision making in mental health care. Specifically, it compares the diagnostic decision outcomes (i.e., the qualityof diagnoses) and the diagnostic decision process (i.e., pre-decisional information acquisition patterns) of novice and experienced clinicalpsychologists. Participants’ eye movements were recorded while they completed diagnostic tasks, classifying mental disorders. In line withprevious research, our findings indicate that diagnosticians’ performance is not related to their clinical experience. Eye-tracking data pro-vide corroborative evidence for this result from the process perspective: experience does not predict changes in cue inspection patterns. Forfuture research into expertise in this domain, it is advisable to track individual differences between clinicians rather than study differenceson the group level.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://boris.unibe.ch/72777/1/Schulte-Mecklenbeck_et_al-2015-Journal_of_Behavioral_Decision_Making.pdf

Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael; Spaanjaars, Nano; Witteman, Cilia (2015). The (In)visibility of Psychodiagnosticians' Expertise. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, n/a-n/a. Wiley 10.1002/bdm.1925 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1925>

doi:10.7892/boris.72777

info:doi:10.1002/bdm.1925

urn:issn:1099-0771

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Wiley

Relação

http://boris.unibe.ch/72777/

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Fonte

Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael; Spaanjaars, Nano; Witteman, Cilia (2015). The (In)visibility of Psychodiagnosticians' Expertise. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, n/a-n/a. Wiley 10.1002/bdm.1925 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1925>

Palavras-Chave #650 Management & public relations #150 Psychology
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

PeerReviewed