The EU’s Decision-Making Process Changes in the Constitutive Treaties


Autoria(s): Calapod, Andrei; Matei, Ani
Data(s)

19/05/2015

Resumo

Since the beginning of its existence in the form of communities, the European Union’s decision-making process underwent constant evolution. There were continuous adjustments that transformed a pure intergovernmental process into one having rather federal features. Based on the hypothesis that changes have occurred at the decision level in regards to the actors, procedures, influence and ways of taking decisions in order for the new realities, needs and will at the European level to be properly addressed, this paper aims to present the reforms performed through the adoption of new treaties and the modification of the existing ones. The reality is that in order for the European dream and integration to go on and also for further development of the European Union, finally becoming an entity far beyond the founders expectations, decision makers had to constantly and carefully adapt the decision-making process. The purpose of this paper will be achieved by conducting a research based on the qualitative method, analyzing the related researches on this topic and the consolidated versions of the treaties. Thus, we will finally validate our research hypothesis that there was an evolution in what the EU’s decision-making process and decision procedures are concerned.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://aei.pitt.edu/71649/1/Calapod_Matei_EU_decisioon_making.pdf

Calapod, Andrei and Matei, Ani (2015) The EU’s Decision-Making Process Changes in the Constitutive Treaties. European Integration - Realities and Perspectives. Proceedings. pp. 184-191. ISSN 2067-9211

Publicador

Danubius University,Galati,Romania

Relação

http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/

http://aei.pitt.edu/71649/

Palavras-Chave #Constitution for Europe #Amsterdam Treaty #Maastricht Treaty #Lisbon Treaty #decision making/policy-making #historical development of EC (pre-1986)
Tipo

Article

PeerReviewed