A Progressive Promoter of Women’s Rights? Comparing EU Policy towards the ACP and the EMP Countries. Bruges Regional Integration & Global Governance Paper #3.2015


Autoria(s): Väänänen, Eleonoora
Data(s)

01/10/2015

Resumo

The paper offers an analysis of the degree to which two different external policy frameworks of the European Union (EU) have institutionalised and operationalised the EU’s commitment to women’s rights and gender equality. It compares the EU’s relations with the African Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries with the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (EMP), using Senegal and Morocco as case studies. Although the comparison shows some resemblances between the two cases, as a whole women’s rights seem more deeply embedded in the institutional framework of EU-ACP relations than that of Euro-Mediterranean relations, and this together with the EU’s approach towards implementation has enabled its women’s rights policy to be slightly more influential on the ground in Senegal than in Morocco. However, both EU-ACP and EMP frameworks have their limits, reflecting the more general problem of inconsistency between the EU’s declaratory objectives and its actual promotion of human rights.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://aei.pitt.edu/69254/1/brigg_3_2015_vaananen.pdf

Väänänen, Eleonoora (2015) A Progressive Promoter of Women’s Rights? Comparing EU Policy towards the ACP and the EMP Countries. Bruges Regional Integration & Global Governance Paper #3.2015. [Working Paper]

Relação

https://www.coleurope.eu/website/study/eu-international-relations-and-diplomacy-studies/research-activities/bruges-regional

http://aei.pitt.edu/69254/

Palavras-Chave #EU-Mediterranean/Union for the Mediterranean #EU-ACP #gender policy/equal opportunity
Tipo

Working Paper

NonPeerReviewed