Antitrust, regulatory capture and economic integration. Bruegel Policy Contribution ISSUE 2015/11, JULY 2015


Autoria(s): Mariniello, Mario; Neven, Damien; Padilla, Jorge
Data(s)

01/07/2015

Resumo

There is growing worldwide concern about bias in the enforcement of competition law in favour of domestic firms. Even seemingly neutral antitrust laws can lead discrimination if they are enforced selectively. - Authors investigate the distortions that national competition authorities generate when they pursue non-competition goals in favour of domestic firms, and discuss ways to address this negative policy development in a globalised world. - The distortions identified in the paper would dissipate if governments agreed that the sole objective of competition law ought to be the protection of consumer welfare that competition-law institutions ought to be protected against capture. - A realistic and effective way to prompt international convergence towards independent enforcement of competition laws is through the inclusion of competition clauses in bilateral trade agreements and the development of dispute-resolution mechanisms.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://aei.pitt.edu/66047/1/Antitrust%2C_regulatory_capture_and_economic_integration_(English).pdf

Mariniello, Mario and Neven, Damien and Padilla, Jorge (2015) Antitrust, regulatory capture and economic integration. Bruegel Policy Contribution ISSUE 2015/11, JULY 2015. [Policy Paper]

Relação

http://www.bruegel.org/publications/publication-detail/publication/891-antitrust-regulatory-capture-and-economic-integration/

http://aei.pitt.edu/66047/

Palavras-Chave #competition policy
Tipo

Policy Paper

NonPeerReviewed