The Asset Quality Review and Capital Needs: Why re-capitalise banks with public money? CEPS Policy Brief No. 311, 19 December 2013
Data(s) |
01/12/2013
|
---|---|
Resumo |
It is generally assumed that any capital needs discovered by the Asset Quality Review the ECB is scheduled to finish by the end of 2014 should be filled by public funding (= fiscal backstop). This assumption is wrong, however. Banks that do not have enough capital should be asked to obtain it from the market; or be restructured using the procedures and rules recently agreed. The Directorate-General for Competition at the European Commission should be particularly vigilant to ensure that no further state aid flows to an already oversized European banking system. The case for a public backstop was strong when the entire euro area banking system was under stress, but this is no longer the case. Banks with a viable business model can find capital; those without should be closed because any public-sector re-capitalisation would likely mean throwing good money after bad. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador |
http://aei.pitt.edu/46344/1/PB311_DG_Asset_Quality_Review.pdf Gros, Daniel. (2013) The Asset Quality Review and Capital Needs: Why re-capitalise banks with public money? CEPS Policy Brief No. 311, 19 December 2013. [Policy Paper] |
Relação |
http://www.ceps.be/book/asset-quality-review-and-capital-needs-why-re-capitalise-banks-public-money http://aei.pitt.edu/46344/ |
Palavras-Chave | #capital, goods, services, workers |
Tipo |
Policy Paper NonPeerReviewed |