O que queremos ser quando crescermos? Diálogos imaginários com um trans-humanista
Data(s) |
03/07/2016
03/07/2016
01/04/2011
|
---|---|
Resumo |
Through an imaginary dialogue with a defender of the transhumanism – whose most significant representative is the philosopher Nick Bostrom – this paper aims to critically evaluate the ethical legitimacy of becoming a posthuman when we grow up. After a characterization of the transhumanist project and a definition of posthuman condition, the axiological reasons that underlie the desire to become a posthuman are examined.In a second momentit will be discussed the issue of whether we should want to be a posthuman when we grow up. A comparison is carried out between the relative strength of the arguments for the legitimacy of the transhumanist project and the possible objections, which are mainly based in an appeal to the idea of human nature, that are usually produced by the critics of transhumanism, such as Francis Fukuyama. Finally, the real possibilities of becoming a post human are outlined and, considering the uncertainty about the future and the difference between what can and what should be done, we are asked toreally think about what we want to be. |
Identificador |
Pires, Manuel João, "Metafísica leibniziana da comunicação – o paradigma monadológico", Philosophica 37 (Abril 2011): 153-176. 0872-4784 |
Idioma(s) |
por |
Publicador |
Edições Colibri / Departamento de Filosofia da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa |
Relação |
http://revistaphilosophica.weebly.com/2011.html |
Direitos |
openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
Palavras-Chave | #Filosofia #transhumanism #Nick Bostrom #Francis Fukuyama |
Tipo |
article |