Screen-printed electrode based electrochemical detector coupled with ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and microvolume back-extraction for determination of mercury in water samples
Contribuinte(s) |
Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Química Analítica, Nutrición y Bromatología Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Universitario de Materiales Espectroscopía Atómica-Masas y Química Analítica en Condiciones Extremas |
---|---|
Data(s) |
19/01/2015
19/01/2015
01/04/2015
|
Resumo |
A novel approach is presented, whereby gold nanostructured screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCnAuEs) are combined with in-situ ionic liquid formation dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (in-situ IL-DLLME) and microvolume back-extraction for the determination of mercury in water samples. In-situ IL-DLLME is based on a simple metathesis reaction between a water-miscible IL and a salt to form a water-immiscible IL into sample solution. Mercury complex with ammonium pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate is extracted from sample solution into the water-immiscible IL formed in-situ. Then, an ultrasound-assisted procedure is employed to back-extract the mercury into 10 µL of a 4 M HCl aqueous solution, which is finally analyzed using SPCnAuEs. Sample preparation methodology was optimized using a multivariate optimization strategy. Under optimized conditions, a linear range between 0.5 and 10 µg L−1 was obtained with a correlation coefficient of 0.997 for six calibration points. The limit of detection obtained was 0.2 µg L−1, which is lower than the threshold value established by the Environmental Protection Agency and European Union (i.e., 2 µg L−1 and 1 µg L−1, respectively). The repeatability of the proposed method was evaluated at two different spiking levels (3 and 10 µg L−1) and a coefficient of variation of 13% was obtained in both cases. The performance of the proposed methodology was evaluated in real-world water samples including tap water, bottled water, river water and industrial wastewater. Relative recoveries between 95% and 108% were obtained. The authors would like to thank the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Project nos. CTQ2011-23968 and CTQ2011-24560), the Generalitat Valenciana (Spain) (Project nos. ACOMP/2013/072, PROMETEO/2013/038 and GV/2014/096) and the University of Alicante (Spain) (Project no. GRE12-45) for the financial support. E. Fernández and D. Martín-Yerga also thank Generalitat Valenciana and Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, respectively, for their fellowships. |
Identificador |
Talanta. 2015, 135: 34-40. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2014.11.069 0039-9140 (Print) 1873-3573 (Online) http://hdl.handle.net/10045/44108 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.11.069 |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
Elsevier |
Relação |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2014.11.069 |
Direitos |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Palavras-Chave | #Liquid-phase microextraction #Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction #Ionic liquid #Mercury #Screen-printed electrode #Water samples #Química Analítica |
Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |