Mapping and exploring health systems' response to intimate partner violence in Spain


Autoria(s): Goicolea, Isabel; Briones Vozmediano, Erica; Öhman, Ann; Edin, Kerstin; Minvielle, Fauhn; Vives-Cases, Carmen
Contribuinte(s)

Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia

Salud Pública

Data(s)

19/12/2013

19/12/2013

10/12/2013

Resumo

Background: For a comprehensive health sector response to intimate partner violence (IPV), interventions should target individual and health facility levels, along with the broader health systems level which includes issues of governance, financing, planning, service delivery, monitoring and evaluation, and demand generation. This study aims to map and explore the integration of IPV response in the Spanish national health system. Methods: Information was collected on five key areas based on WHO recommendations: policy environment, protocols, training, monitoring and prevention. A systematic review of public documents was conducted to assess 39 indicators in each of Spain’s 17 regional health systems. In addition, we performed qualitative content analysis of 26 individual interviews with key informants responsible for coordinating the health sector response to IPV in Spain. Results: In 88% of the 17 autonomous regions, the laws concerning IPV included the health sector response, but the integration of IPV in regional health plans was just 41%. Despite the existence of a supportive national structure, responding to IPV still relies strongly on the will of health professionals. All seventeen regions had published comprehensive protocols to guide the health sector response to IPV, but participants recognized that responding to IPV was more complex than merely following the steps of a protocol. Published training plans existed in 43% of the regional health systems, but none had institutionalized IPV training in medical and nursing schools. Only 12% of regional health systems collected information on the quality of the IPV response, and there are many limitations to collecting information on IPV within health services, for example underreporting, fears about confidentiality, and underuse of data for monitoring purposes. Finally, preventive activities that were considered essential were not institutionalized anywhere. Conclusions: Within the Spanish health system, differences exist in terms of achievements both between regions and between the areas assessed. Progress towards integration of IPV has been notable at the level of policy, less outstanding regarding health service delivery, and very limited in terms of preventive actions.

This study has been funded by a COFAS grant (supported by COFUND action within the Marie Curie Action People, in the Seventh Framework programme and the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research/FAS-Forskningsradet för arbetsliv och socialvetenskap).

Identificador

BMC Public Health 2013, 13:1162 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-1162

1471-2458

http://hdl.handle.net/10045/34695

10.1186/1471-2458-13-1162

A7269390

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

BioMed Central

Relação

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1162

Direitos

© 2013 Goicolea et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Palavras-Chave #Health system #Health policy #Intimate partner violence #Spain #Mixed methods #Content analysis #Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article