Curtin-Hammett versus non-Curtin-Hammett frameworks is optimizing the enantioselective binolam/titanium(IV)-catalyzed cyanobenzoylation of aldehydes: Part 2


Autoria(s): Saá Rodríguez, José Manuel; Baeza, Alejandro; Nájera Domingo, Carmen; Sansano, Jose M.
Contribuinte(s)

Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Química Orgánica

Universidad de las Islas Baleares. Departamento de Química

Procesos Catalíticos en Síntesis Orgánica

Data(s)

16/09/2011

16/09/2011

2011

30/06/2011

Resumo

Extensive experimental and computational studies have been carried out on the enantioselective titanium(IV)-catalyzed cyanobenzoylation of aldehydes using 1:n Binolam:Ti(OiPr)4 mixtures as precatalysts, with the purpose of identifying the key mechanistic aspects governing enantioselectivity. HCN and isopropyl benzoate were detected in the reacting mixtures. This, as well as the reaction’s response to the presence of an exogenous base, and the failure to react in the presence of Binol:Ti(OiPr)4 mixtures, led us to propose not a direct cyanobenzoylation but an indirect process involving enantioselective hydrocyanation followed by O-benzoylation. Computational work provided positive evidence for the intervention of both indirect and direct cyanobenzoylation routes, the former being faster. However, the standard Curtin–Hammett-based optimization search ended with unsatisfactory results. Experimental and computational DFT studies (B3LYP/6-31G*) led us to conclude that: (1) the overall cyanobenzoylation of aldehydes catalyzed by 1:n Binolam:Ti(OiPr)4 mixtures involves an enantioselective hydrocyanation followed by an stereochemically inert O-benzoylation; (2) the initial complexes prevailing in a 1:1 Binolam:Ti(OiPr)4 mixture are the solvated mononuclear monomer 5·2(iPrOH) and solvated dinuclear dimer 9·2(iPrOH), whereas 9·2(iPrOH) is the major component in a 1:2 or higher 1:n mixture; (3) since the slowest step is that of benzoylation of ligated iPrOH which yields the actual catalysts 5–9, the catalytic system fits into a non-Curtin–Hammett framework, the final products deriving from a kinetic quench of the competing routes; and (4) accordingly, catalysis by 1:1 Binolam:Ti(OiPr)4 mixtures should involve cyanobenzoylations promoted by mononuclear 5, contaminated with those promoted by some dinuclear open dimer 9, whereas cyanobenzoylations catalyzed by a 1:2 and higher 1:n mixtures should be the result of catalysis promoted by the large amounts of dinuclear open dimer 9.

This work is supported by MICINN (Spain) through projects CTQ2007-62952/BQU, CTQ2007-62771/BQU, CTQ2010-20387, CTQ2010-17339 and Consolider INGENIO 2010 CSD2007-00006.

Identificador

SAÁ, José M., et al. "Curtin-Hammett versus non-Curtin-Hammett frameworks is optimizing the enantioselective binolam/titanium(IV)-catalyzed cyanobenzoylation of aldehydes: Part 2". Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. Vol. 22, No. 12 (30 June 2011). ISSN 0957-4166, pp. 1292-1305

0957-4166 (Print)

1362-511X (Online)

http://hdl.handle.net/10045/18658

10.1016/j.tetasy.2011.07.005

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Elsevier

Relação

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2011.07.005

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Palavras-Chave #Enantioselective #Titanium #Química Orgánica
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article