Comment on Rule 14a-8(i)(9), Securities and Exchange Commission, June 30, 2015
Data(s) |
01/01/2015
|
---|---|
Resumo |
The Securities and Exchange Commission has been analyzing its interpretation under Subsection (i)(9) of Rule 14a-8. This provision allows for the exclusion of shareholder proposals that conflict with those submitted by management. The staff has been examining its interpretation since instructed to do so by the chair of the SEC following a no action appeal in a case involving Whole Foods. A number of letters and memos submitted in connection with the review have analyzed the issue. At least one asserted that any change in interpretation required the Commission to go through the process of notice and comment. This letter asserts that notice and comment is not required, relying extensively on Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador |
http://digitalcommons.du.edu/law_facpub/17 http://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=law_facpub |
Publicador |
Digital Commons @ DU |
Fonte |
Faculty Scholarship |
Palavras-Chave | #Securities and Exchange Commission #Rule 14a-8 #Whole Foods #Law |
Tipo |
text |