The reviewing process: validating results
| Data(s) |
01/03/2012
|
|---|---|
| Resumo |
Any scientific publication aims to advance the field of knowledge that it deals with, and therefore the editorial staff will always be seeking the most revolutionary papers among all of those received. On the other hand, the reviewers’ task is usually a much more conservative one, as reviewers are responsible for verifying the realism of the methods proposed and the veracity of the claimed results. |
| Formato |
application/pdf |
| Identificador | |
| Idioma(s) |
eng |
| Publicador |
E.T.S.I. Industriales (UPM) |
| Relação |
http://oa.upm.es/15526/1/INVE_MEM_2012_96122.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2190360 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1109/MRA.2012.2190360 |
| Direitos |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Fonte |
IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, ISSN 1070-9932, 2012-03, Vol. 19, No. 1 |
| Palavras-Chave | #Educación |
| Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article Artículo PeerReviewed |
