(Table 2) Magnetic properties and oxidation state of titanomagnetite in MORB older than 100 Ma, DSDP Hole 26-257
| Cobertura |
LATITUDE: -30.986000 * LONGITUDE: 108.349800 * DATE/TIME START: 1972-10-20T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 1972-10-20T00:00:00 * MINIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 265.87 m * MAXIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 323.97 m |
|---|---|
| Data(s) |
20/01/2005
|
| Formato |
text/tab-separated-values, 45 data points |
| Identificador |
https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.711494 doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.711494 |
| Idioma(s) |
en |
| Publicador |
PANGAEA |
| Relação |
doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.711520 Wang, Daming; Van der Voo, Rob; Peacor, Donald R (2005): Why is the remanent magnetic intensity of Cretaceous MORB so much higher than that of mid to late Cenozoic MORB? Geosphere, 1(3), 138-146, doi:10.1130/GES00024.1 |
| Direitos |
CC-BY: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Access constraints: unrestricted |
| Palavras-Chave | #26-257; AGE; a - lattice parameter; Analytical electron microscopy (AEM); Coercivity; Curie temperature; Deep Sea Drilling Project; DEPTH, sediment/rock; DRILL; Drilling/drill rig; DSDP; Glomar Challenger; Hysteresis, coercivity of remanence/coercivity; Hysteresis, saturation magnetization; Hysteresis, saturation magnetization/ saturation remanence; Hysteresis, saturation remanence; Indian Ocean//BASIN; Intensity X; Intensity Z; Leg26; NRM, Intensity per unit mass; NRM, median destructive field of natural remanent magnetisation, alternating field; ODP sample designation; Sample code/label; Transmission electron microscope (TEM); vibrating sample magnetometer (microVSM) |
| Tipo |
Dataset |
