MTurk Survey on "Mood and Personality". Documentation


Autoria(s): Höglinger, Marc; Jann, Ben
Data(s)

15/02/2016

Resumo

Social desirability and the fear of negative consequences often deter a considerable share of survey respondents from responding truthfully to sensitive questions. Thus, resulting prevalence estimates are biased. Indirect techniques for surveying sensitive questions such as the Randomized Response Technique are intended to mitigate misreporting by providing complete concealment of individual answers. However, it is far from clear whether these indirect techniques actually produce more valid measurements than standard direct questioning. In order to evaluate the validity of different sensitive question techniques we carried out an online validation experiment at Amazon Mechanical Turk in which respondents' self-reports of norm-breaking behavior (cheating in dice games) were validated against observed behavior. This document describes the design of the validation experiment and provides details on the questionnaire, the different sensitive question technique implementations, the field work, and the resulting dataset. The appendix contains a codebook of the data and facsimiles of the questionnaire pages and other survey materials.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://boris.unibe.ch/81516/1/ASQ-MTurk-2013.pdf

Höglinger, Marc; Jann, Ben (2016). MTurk Survey on "Mood and Personality". Documentation (University of Bern Social Sciences Working Papers 17). Bern: University of Bern and ETH Zurich

doi:10.7892/boris.81516

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

University of Bern and ETH Zurich

Relação

http://boris.unibe.ch/81516/

https://ideas.repec.org/p/bss/wpaper/17.html

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Fonte

Höglinger, Marc; Jann, Ben (2016). MTurk Survey on "Mood and Personality". Documentation (University of Bern Social Sciences Working Papers 17). Bern: University of Bern and ETH Zurich

Palavras-Chave #300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/report

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

NonPeerReviewed