Carbon cycling in the northern Humboldt Current off Chile
Cobertura |
LATITUDE: -23.002500 * LONGITUDE: -70.440500 * DATE/TIME START: 2000-10-19T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 2001-10-30T00:00:00 |
---|---|
Data(s) |
19/05/2004
|
Resumo |
The structure of the zooplankton foodweb and their dominant carbon fluxes were studied in the upwelling system off northern Chile (Mejillones Bay; 23°S) between October 2000 and December 2002. High primary production (PP) rates (18 gC/m**2 d) were mostly due to the net-phytoplankton size fraction (>23 µm). High PP has been traditionally associated with the wind-driven upwelling fertilizing effect of equatorial subsurface waters, which favour development of a short food chain dominated by a few small clupeiform fish species. The objective of the present work was to study the trophic carbon flow through the first step of this 'classical chain' (from phytoplankton to primary consumers such as copepods and euphausiids) and the carbon flow towards the gelatinous web composed of both filter-feeding and carnivorous zooplankton. To accomplish this objective, feeding experiments with copepods, appendicularians, ctenophores, and chaetognaths were conducted using naturally occurring plankton prey assemblages. Throughout the study, the total carbon ingestion rates showed that the dominant appendicularian species and small copepods consumed an average of 7 and 5 µgC/ind d, respectively. In addition, copepods ingested particles mainly in the size range of nano- and microplankton, whereas appendicularians ingested in the range of pico- and nanoplankton. Small copepods and appendicularians removed a small fraction of total daily PP (range 6-11%). However, when the pico- + nanoplankton fractions were the major contributors to total PP (oligotrophic conditions), grazing by small copepods increased markedly to 86% of total PP. Under these more oligotrophic conditions, the euphausiids grazing increased as well, but only reached values lower than 5% of total PP. During this study, chaetognaths and ctenophores ingested an average of 1 and 14 copepods/ind d, respectively. In terms of biomass consumed, the potential impact of carnivorous gelatinous zooplankton on the small-size copepod community (preferred prey) was important (2-12% of biomass removed daily). However, their impact produced more significant results on copepod abundance (up to 33%), which suggests that carnivorous gelatinous zooplankton may even modulate (control) the abundance of some species as well as the size structure of the copepod community. |
Formato |
application/zip, 3 datasets |
Identificador |
https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.738257 doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.738257 |
Idioma(s) |
en |
Publicador |
PANGAEA |
Direitos |
CC-BY: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Access constraints: unrestricted |
Fonte |
Supplement to: González, Humberto E; Giesecke, R; Vargas, C A; Pavez, M; Iriarte, J L; Santibañez, P; Castro, L; Escribano, Rubén; Pagés, F (2004): Carbon cycling through the pelagic foodweb in the northern Humboldt Current off Chile (23°S). ICES Journal of Marine Science, 61(4), 572-584, doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.03.021 |
Palavras-Chave | #< 1.5 mm; > 1.5 mm; A. tonsa; Acartia tonsa; Appendicu; Appendicularia; Appendicularia, grazing rate per individual; C. brachiatus; Calculated; Carbon, total flux; CENSOR; Centropages brachiatus; C flux; Chaetognatha; Chl a; Chl a conc; Chlorophyll a; Chlorophyll a, areal concentration; Cil; Ciliates; Climate variability and El Niño Southern Oscillation; Copepoda; Copepoda grazing rate per individual; Copepoda ingestion rate per individual; Corycaeus sp.; Counting; Ctenoph; Ctenophora; Depth, bottom/max; Depth, top/min; DEPTH, water; Depth bot; Depth top; Depth water; Dinoflagellates, athecate; Dinoflagellates, thecate; Dinofl athecate; Dinofl thecate; Euphaus; Euphausiacea; Euphausiacea grazing rate per individual; Event; Flag; Flagellates; Geminis_I; Geminis_II; Geminis_III; Geminis_IV; GR appendic/ind; GR copepoda/ind; GR euphaus/ind; IR copepoda/ind; mainly strombilidiis; Mejillones_Bay; Mejillones Bay, Chile; MULT; Multiple investigations; Nanoplankton, production as carbon; net; NP prod C; Oithona sp.; Oncaea sp.; P. parvus parpar; Paracalanus parvus parpar; Phytoplankton, production as carbon; Phytopl prod C; PI; Picoplankton, production as carbon; Picopl prod C; Pleurobrachia sp. on acartia tonsa; Pleurobrachia sp. on centropages brachiatus; Pleurobrachia sp. on corycaeus sp.; Pleurobrachia sp. on oithona sp.; Pleurobrachia sp. on oncaea sp.; Pleurobrachia sp. on paracalanus parvus; Predation impact; Sagitta enfalta on acartia tonsa; Sagitta enfalta on corycaeus sp.; Sagitta enfalta on oithona sp.; Sagitta enfalta on oncaea sp.; Sagitta enfalta on paracalanus parvus; Time-series station |
Tipo |
Dataset |