Magnetic susceptibility and electric conductivity of marine surficial sediments by benthic electromagnetic profiling


Autoria(s): Müller, H; von Dobeneck, Tilo; Hilgenfeldt, Christian; SanFelipo, Bill; Rey, Daniel; Rubio, Belen
Cobertura

MEDIAN LATITUDE: 42.066162 * MEDIAN LONGITUDE: -9.128179 * SOUTH-BOUND LATITUDE: 41.964793 * WEST-BOUND LONGITUDE: -9.374029 * NORTH-BOUND LATITUDE: 42.166935 * EAST-BOUND LONGITUDE: -8.974898 * DATE/TIME START: 2008-06-05T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 2008-06-17T00:00:00

Data(s)

16/02/2012

Resumo

Distribution, accumulation and diagenesis of surficial sediments in coastal and continental shelf systems follow complex chains of localized processes and form deposits of great spatial variability. Given the environmental and economic relevance of ocean margins, there is growing need for innovative geophysical exploration methods to characterize seafloor sediments by more than acoustic properties. A newly conceptualized benthic profiling and data processing approach based on controlled source electromagnetic (CSEM) imaging permits to coevally quantify the magnetic susceptibility and the electric conductivity of shallow marine deposits. The two physical properties differ fundamentally insofar as magnetic susceptibility mostly assesses solid particle characteristics such as terrigenous or iron mineral content, redox state and contamination level, while electric conductivity primarily relates to the fluid-filled pore space and detects salinity, porosity and grain-size variations. We develop and validate a layered half-space inversion algorithm for submarine multifrequency CSEM with concentric sensor configuration. Guided by results of modeling, we modified a commercial land CSEM sensor for submarine application, which was mounted into a nonconductive and nonmagnetic bottom-towed sled. This benthic EM profiler Neridis II achieves 25 soundings/second at 3-4 knots over continuous profiles of up to hundred kilometers. Magnetic susceptibility is determined from the 75 Hz in-phase response (90% signal originates from the top 50 cm), while electric conductivity is derived from the 5 kHz out-of-phase (quadrature) component (90% signal from the top 92 cm). Exemplary survey data from the north-west Iberian margin underline the excellent sensitivity, functionality and robustness of the system in littoral (~0-50 m) and neritic (~50-300 m) environments. Susceptibility vs. porosity cross-plots successfully identify known lithofacies units and their transitions. All presently available data indicate an eminent potential of CSEM profiling for assessing the complex distribution of shallow marine surficial sediments and for revealing climatic, hydrodynamic, diagenetic and anthropogenic factors governing their formation.

Formato

application/zip, 15 datasets

Identificador

https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.776056

doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.776056

Idioma(s)

en

Publicador

PANGAEA

Direitos

CC-BY: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported

Access constraints: unrestricted

Fonte

Supplement to: Müller, H; von Dobeneck, Tilo; Hilgenfeldt, Christian; SanFelipo, Bill; Rey, Daniel; Rubio, Belen (2012): Mapping the magnetic susceptibility and electric conductivity of marine surficial sediments by benthic EM profiling. Geophysics, 77(1), E43-E56, doi:10.1190/GEO2010-0129.1

Palavras-Chave #<63 µm; 16025Hz in-phase component; 16025Hz quadrature component; 2025Hz in-phase component; 2025Hz quadrature component; 4775Hz in-phase component; 4775Hz quadrature component; 525Hz in-phase component; 525Hz quadrature component; apparent resistivity; B; Center for Marine Environmental Sciences; clay and silt content; Computed using a finite-element model; Cond; Cond response; Conductivity; Conductivity response; Depth; DEPTH, sediment/rock; DEPTH, water; Depth of reflector; depth of the iron redox boundary; depth of the mud to sand layer transition; Depth refl; Depth water; Diameter; Distance; DISTANCE; distance to sensor plane; electric conductivity measured at 16025 Hz; electric conductivity measured at 4775 Hz; electric conductivity measured at 525 Hz; electromagnetics; Electromagnetic sensor (Aeroquest Sensortech Ltd. GEM-3); EM Profiler, NERIDIS II; Factor; footprint diameter of 50% of the electric conductivity signal (in-phase); footprint diameter of 50% of the electric conductivity signal (quadrature); footprint diameter of 50% of the magnetic susceptibility signal; footprint diameter of 90% of the electric conductivity signal (in-phase); footprint diameter of 90% of the electric conductivity signal (quadrature); footprint diameter of 90% of the magnetic susceptibility signal; Freq; Frequency; GeoB130106; GeoB130124; High-pass filtered bathymetry; in-phase response of GEM-3 sensor at 1025 Hz; in-phase response of GEM-3 sensor at 16025 Hz; in-phase response of GEM-3 sensor at 175 Hz; in-phase response of GEM-3 sensor at 2025 Hz; in-phase response of GEM-3 sensor at 4775 Hz; in-phase response of GEM-3 sensor at 525 Hz; in-phase response of GEM-3 sensor at 75 Hz; kappa; lateral response of GEM-3 sensor for quadrature conductivity (5 kHz); lateral response of GEM-3 sensor for susceptibility; Latitude; LATITUDE; Log10_sigma*f_(S/ms); Longitude; LONGITUDE; Magnetic field, X-component; Magnetic field, Z-component; Magnetic flux density; Magnetic response; magnetic susceptibility; magnetic susceptibility determined from core samples; magnetic susceptibility determined with the EM sensor (in-situ); magnetic susceptibility measured with a 40 cm diameter coil; magnetic susceptibility measured with a 64 cm diameter coil; magnetic susceptibility measured with a 96 cm diameter coil; magnetic susceptibility of the sediment matrix; mapping; marine sediments; MARUM; modelled; modified after Won and Huang, 2004; NER-II; Normalized to peak values; Poros; Porosity; porosity determined from core samples; porosity determined with the EM sensor (in-situ); POS366/3; Poseidon; Product of electric conductivity and frequency; profile distance; quadrature response of GEM-3 sensor at 1025 Hz; quadrature response of GEM-3 sensor at 16025 Hz; quadrature response of GEM-3 sensor at 175 Hz; quadrature response of GEM-3 sensor at 2025 Hz; quadrature response of GEM-3 sensor at 4775 Hz; quadrature response of GEM-3 sensor at 525 Hz; quadrature response of GEM-3 sensor at 75 Hz; radial distance; Ratio; Relative contribution of the magnetic response to total in-phase signal; Sal; Salinity; Satur; Saturation; saturation of the electric conductivity signal with depth; saturation of the magnetic susceptibility signal with depth; Seafloor und; Seafloor undulation; Size fraction < 0.063 mm, mud, pelite, silt+clay; Susceptibility, volume; Susceptibility, volume, normalized; Susceptibility response; susceptibility weighting factor (magnetic subsurface); Susc response; Susc vol n; weighting factor for 10 kHz signal (conductive subsurface); weighting factor for 1 kHz signal (conductive subsurface); weighting factor for 5 kHz signal (conductive subsurface); X-comp; Z-comp; Ø
Tipo

Dataset