Thermal conductivity at DSDP Leg 60 Holes


Autoria(s): Horai, Ki-Iti
Cobertura

MEDIAN LATITUDE: 17.842445 * MEDIAN LONGITUDE: 146.057955 * SOUTH-BOUND LATITUDE: 17.667000 * WEST-BOUND LONGITUDE: 143.682500 * NORTH-BOUND LATITUDE: 18.013000 * EAST-BOUND LONGITUDE: 148.629200 * DATE/TIME START: 1978-03-23T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 1978-05-09T00:00:00

Data(s)

10/10/1982

Resumo

A total of 1547 thermal conductivity values were determined by both the NP (needle probe method) and the QTM (quick thermal conductivity meter) on 1319 samples recovered during DSDP Leg 60. The NP method is primarily for the measurement of soft sedimentary samples, and the result is free from the effect of porewater evaporation. Measurement by the QTM method is faster and is applicable to all types of samples-namely, sediments (soft, semilithified, and lithified) and basement rocks. Data from the deep holes at Sites 453, 458, and 459 show that the thermal conductivity increases with depth, the rate of increase ranging from (0.18 mcal/cm s °C)/100 m at Site 459 to (0.72 mcal/cm s °C)/100 m at Site 456. A positive correlation between the sedimentary accumulation rate and the rate of thermal conductivity increase with depth indicates that both compaction and lithification are important factors. Drilled pillow basalts show nearly uniform thermal conductivity. At She 454 the thermal conductivity of one basaltic flow unit was higher near the center of the unit and lower toward the margin, reflecting variable vesicularity. Hydrothermally altered basalts at Site 456 showed higher thermal conductivity than fresh basalt because secondary calcite, quartz, and pyrite are generally more thermally conductive than fresh basalt. The average thermal conductivity in the top 50 meters of sediments correlates inversely with water depth because of dissolution of calcite, a mineral with high thermal conductivity, from the sediments as the water depth exceeds the lysocline and the carbonate compensation depth. Differences between the Mariana Trench data and the Mariana Basin and Trough data may reflect different abundances of terrigenous material in the sediment. There are remarkable correlations between thermal conductivity and other physical properties. The relationship between thermal conductivity and compressional wave velocity can be used to infer the ocean crustal thermal conductivity from the seismic velocity structure.

Formato

application/zip, 10 datasets

Identificador

https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.820254

doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.820254

Idioma(s)

en

Publicador

PANGAEA

Direitos

CC-BY: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported

Access constraints: unrestricted

Fonte

Supplement to: Horai, Ki-Iti (1982): Thermal conductivity of sediments and igneous rocks recovered during Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 60. In: Hussong, DM; Uyeda, S; et al. (eds.), Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project (U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 60, 807-834, doi:10.2973/dsdp.proc.60.149.1982

Palavras-Chave #60-452; 60-452A; 60-453; 60-454; 60-454A; 60-455; 60-456; 60-456A; 60-458; 60-459; 60-459B; 60-460; 60-460A; 60-461; 60-461A; And constituent rock; basalt, diabase 5.46; And constituent rock; breccia 4.96; And constituent rock; gabbro, norite 6.42; And constituent rock; serpentinized gabbro, norite 4.15; Comment; Conductivity, thermal; Conductivity, thermal, standard deviation; Deep Sea Drilling Project; Depth; DEPTH, sediment/rock; DRILL; Drilling/drill rig; DSDP; Estimated Core/Section; Event; Glomar Challenger; k; k std dev; l; Label; Leg60; Length; mbsf; North Pacific/BASIN; North Pacific/SEDIMENT POND; North Pacific/TRENCH; ODP sample designation; Quick Thermal Conductivity Meter; Repl; Replicates; Sample; Sample code/label
Tipo

Dataset