Comparison of whole carcass condemnation and partial carcass condemnation data for integration in a national syndromic surveillance system: The Swiss experience


Autoria(s): Tedder, Flavie; Reist, Martin
Data(s)

01/03/2015

Resumo

We obtained partial carcass condemnation (PCC) data for cattle (2009-2010) from a Swiss slaughterhouse. Data on whole carcass condemnations (WCC) carried out at the same slaughterhouse over those years were extracted from the national database for meat inspection. We found that given the differences observed in the WCC and PCC time series, it is likely that both indicators respond to different health events in the population and that one cannot be substituted by the other. Because PCC recordings are promising for syndromic surveillance, the meat inspection database should be capable to record both WCC and PCC data in the future. However, a standardised list of reasons for PCC needs to be defined and used nationwide in all slaughterhouses.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://boris.unibe.ch/80775/1/1-s2.0-S0309174014004811-main.pdf

Tedder, Flavie; Reist, Martin (2015). Comparison of whole carcass condemnation and partial carcass condemnation data for integration in a national syndromic surveillance system: The Swiss experience. Meat Science, 101, pp. 48-55. Elsevier 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.002 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.002>

doi:10.7892/boris.80775

info:doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.002

info:pmid:25462382

urn:issn:0309-1740

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Elsevier

Relação

http://boris.unibe.ch/80775/

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Fonte

Tedder, Flavie; Reist, Martin (2015). Comparison of whole carcass condemnation and partial carcass condemnation data for integration in a national syndromic surveillance system: The Swiss experience. Meat Science, 101, pp. 48-55. Elsevier 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.002 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.002>

Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

PeerReviewed