Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.


Autoria(s): Zbinden, Rainer; Piccolo, Raffaele; Heg, Dik; Roffi, Marco; Kurz, David J; Muller, Olivier; Vuilliomenet, André; Cook, Stéphane; Weilenmann, Daniel; Kaiser, Christoph; Jamshidi, Peiman; Franzone, Anna; Eberli, Franz; Jüni, Peter; Windecker, Stephan; Pilgrim, Thomas
Data(s)

15/03/2016

Resumo

BACKGROUND No data are available on the long-term performance of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES). We reported 2-year clinical outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE (Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularisation) trial, which compared BP-SES with durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 2119 patients with minimal exclusion criteria were assigned to treatment with BP-SES (n=1063) or DP-EES (n=1056). Follow-up at 2 years was available for 2048 patients (97%). The primary end point was target-lesion failure, a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization. At 2 years, target-lesion failure occurred in 107 patients (10.5%) in the BP-SES arm and 107 patients (10.4%) in the DP-EES arm (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.77-1.31, P=0.979). There were no significant differences between BP-SES and DP-EES with respect to cardiac death (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.62-1.63, P=0.984), target-vessel myocardial infarction (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.60-1.39, P=0.669), target-lesion revascularization (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.81-1.71, P=0.403), and definite stent thrombosis (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.56-3.44, P=0.485). There were 2 cases (0.2%) of definite very late stent thrombosis in the BP-SES arm and 4 cases (0.4%) in the DP-EES arm (P=0.423). In the prespecified subgroup of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, BP-SES was associated with a lower risk of target-lesion failure compared with DP-EES (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23-0.99, P=0.043, Pinteraction=0.026). CONCLUSIONS Comparable safety and efficacy profiles of BP-SES and DP-EES were maintained throughout 2 years of follow-up. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01443104.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://boris.unibe.ch/80607/1/Zbinden%20JAmHeartAssoc%202016.pdf

Zbinden, Rainer; Piccolo, Raffaele; Heg, Dik; Roffi, Marco; Kurz, David J; Muller, Olivier; Vuilliomenet, André; Cook, Stéphane; Weilenmann, Daniel; Kaiser, Christoph; Jamshidi, Peiman; Franzone, Anna; Eberli, Franz; Jüni, Peter; Windecker, Stephan; Pilgrim, Thomas (2016). Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial. Journal of the American Heart Association, 5(3), e003255. American Heart Association 10.1161/JAHA.116.003255 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003255>

doi:10.7892/boris.80607

info:doi:10.1161/JAHA.116.003255

info:pmid:26979080

urn:issn:2047-9980

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

American Heart Association

Relação

http://boris.unibe.ch/80607/

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Fonte

Zbinden, Rainer; Piccolo, Raffaele; Heg, Dik; Roffi, Marco; Kurz, David J; Muller, Olivier; Vuilliomenet, André; Cook, Stéphane; Weilenmann, Daniel; Kaiser, Christoph; Jamshidi, Peiman; Franzone, Anna; Eberli, Franz; Jüni, Peter; Windecker, Stephan; Pilgrim, Thomas (2016). Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial. Journal of the American Heart Association, 5(3), e003255. American Heart Association 10.1161/JAHA.116.003255 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003255>

Palavras-Chave #610 Medicine & health #360 Social problems & social services
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

PeerReviewed