Comparison of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting coronary stents: final 5-year report of the RESOLUTE all-comers trial


Autoria(s): Iqbal, Javaid; Serruys, Patrick W; Silber, Sigmund; Kelbaek, Henning; Richardt, Gert; Morel, Marie-Angele; Negoita, Manuela; Buszman, Pawel E; Windecker, Stephan
Data(s)

01/06/2015

Resumo

BACKGROUND Newer-generation drug-eluting stents that release zotarolimus or everolimus have been shown to be superior to the first-generation drug-eluting stents. However, data comparing long-term safety and efficacy of zotarolimus- (ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) are limited. RESOLUTE all-comers (Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial compared these 2 stents and has shown that ZES was noninferior to EES at 12-month for the primary end point of target lesion failure. We report the secondary clinical outcomes at the final 5-year follow-up of this trial. METHODS AND RESULTS RESOLUTE all-comer clinical study is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, 2-arm, open-label, noninferiority trial with minimal exclusion criteria. Patients (n=2292) were randomly assigned to treatment with either ZES (n=1140) or EES (n=1152). Patient-oriented composite end point (combination of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and any revascularizations), device-oriented composite end point (combination of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization), and major adverse cardiac events (combination of all-cause death, all myocardial infarction, emergent coronary bypass surgery, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization) were analyzed at 5-year follow-up. The 2 groups were well-matched at baseline. Five-year follow-up data were available for 98% patients. There were no differences in patient-oriented composite end point (ZES 35.3% versus EES 32.0%, P=0.11), device-oriented composite end point (ZES 17.0% versus EES 16.2%, P=0.61), major adverse cardiac events (ZES 21.9% versus EES 21.6%, P=0.88), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ZES 2.8% versus EES 1.8%, P=0.12). CONCLUSIONS At 5-year follow-up, ZES and EES had similar efficacy and safety in a population of patients who had minimal exclusion criteria. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00617084.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://boris.unibe.ch/75919/1/e002230.full.pdf

Iqbal, Javaid; Serruys, Patrick W; Silber, Sigmund; Kelbaek, Henning; Richardt, Gert; Morel, Marie-Angele; Negoita, Manuela; Buszman, Pawel E; Windecker, Stephan (2015). Comparison of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting coronary stents: final 5-year report of the RESOLUTE all-comers trial. Circulation: Cardiovascular interventions, 8(6), e002230. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002230 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002230>

doi:10.7892/boris.75919

info:doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002230

info:pmid:26047993

urn:issn:1941-7632

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Relação

http://boris.unibe.ch/75919/

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Fonte

Iqbal, Javaid; Serruys, Patrick W; Silber, Sigmund; Kelbaek, Henning; Richardt, Gert; Morel, Marie-Angele; Negoita, Manuela; Buszman, Pawel E; Windecker, Stephan (2015). Comparison of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting coronary stents: final 5-year report of the RESOLUTE all-comers trial. Circulation: Cardiovascular interventions, 8(6), e002230. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002230 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002230>

Palavras-Chave #610 Medicine & health
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

PeerReviewed