TICI and Age: What's the Score?


Autoria(s): Slater, L A; Coutinho, J M; Gralla, Jan; Nogueira, R G; Bonafé, A; Dávalos, A; Jahan, R; Levy, E; Baxter, B J; Saver, J L; Pereira, V M
Data(s)

2016

Resumo

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Previous studies have suggested that advanced age predicts worse outcome following mechanical thrombectomy. We assessed outcomes from 2 recent large prospective studies to determine the association among TICI, age, and outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from the Solitaire FR Thrombectomy for Acute Revascularization (STAR) trial, an international multicenter prospective single-arm thrombectomy study and the Solitaire arm of the Solitaire FR With the Intention For Thrombectomy (SWIFT) trial were pooled. TICI was determined by core laboratory review. Good outcome was defined as an mRS score of 0-2 at 90 days. We analyzed the association among clinical outcome, successful-versus-unsuccessful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3 versus TICI 0-2a), and age (dichotomized across the median). RESULTS Two hundred sixty-nine of 291 patients treated with Solitaire in the STAR and SWIFT data bases for whom TICI and 90-day outcome data were available were included. The median age was 70 years (interquartile range, 60-76 years) with an age range of 25-88 years. The mean age of patients 70 years of age or younger was 59 years, and it was 77 years for patients older than 70 years. There was no significant difference between baseline NIHSS scores or procedure time metrics. Hemorrhage and device-related complications were more common in the younger age group but did not reach statistical significance. In absolute terms, the rate of good outcome was higher in the younger population (64% versus 44%, P < .001). However, the magnitude of benefit from successful reperfusion was higher in the 70 years of age and older group (OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.32-17.63 versus OR 7.32; 95% CI, 1.73-30.99). CONCLUSIONS Successful reperfusion is the strongest predictor of good outcome following mechanical thrombectomy, and the magnitude of benefit is highest in the patient population older than 70 years of age.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://boris.unibe.ch/74576/1/ajnr.A4618.full.pdf

Slater, L A; Coutinho, J M; Gralla, Jan; Nogueira, R G; Bonafé, A; Dávalos, A; Jahan, R; Levy, E; Baxter, B J; Saver, J L; Pereira, V M (2016). TICI and Age: What's the Score? AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 37(5), pp. 838-843. American Society of Neuroradiology 10.3174/ajnr.A4618 <http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4618>

doi:10.7892/boris.74576

info:doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4618

info:pmid:26611995

urn:issn:1936-959X

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

American Society of Neuroradiology

Relação

http://boris.unibe.ch/74576/

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Fonte

Slater, L A; Coutinho, J M; Gralla, Jan; Nogueira, R G; Bonafé, A; Dávalos, A; Jahan, R; Levy, E; Baxter, B J; Saver, J L; Pereira, V M (2016). TICI and Age: What's the Score? AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 37(5), pp. 838-843. American Society of Neuroradiology 10.3174/ajnr.A4618 <http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4618>

Palavras-Chave #610 Medicine & health
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

PeerReviewed