Sustainable investment in land in the Global South: What would it require from a coherence perspective? The case of Sierra Leone


Autoria(s): Bürgi, Elisabeth
Data(s)

2015

Resumo

Large scale acquisitions of land in the Global South have signifi-cantly increased since the millennium. It is often the case that foreign investors are involved in such acquisitions, which are commonly aimed at facilitating the export of commodities. These investments in land tend to transform conventional, rather small scale agricultural systems into large scale, industrial agricultural systems. While investment in ag-riculture in the Global South is much needed, large-scale investments in land often goes hand-in-hand with environmental and human rights re-lated challenges. As a consequence, lawyers need to address questions of sovereignty over natural resources (this paper focuses in particular on land resources), to peoples’ right to self-determination, to the responsi-bilities of the home and host states of the investors, including public-private relationships, and the role of international institutions who are involved, as well as relevant jurisprudence. This paper approaches these questions from the perspective of a theory on policy coherence for sus-tainable development.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://boris.unibe.ch/73206/1/03_Sustainable-Investment_BURGHI-BONANOMI_FIN-2.pdf

Bürgi, Elisabeth (2015). Sustainable investment in land in the Global South: What would it require from a coherence perspective? The case of Sierra Leone. Questions of International Law, 21, pp. 17-37. QIL

doi:10.7892/boris.73206

urn:issn:2284-2969

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

QIL

Relação

http://boris.unibe.ch/73206/

http://www.qil-qdi.org/sustainable-investment-in-land-in-the-global-south-what-would-it-require-from-a-coherence-perspective-the-case-of-sierra-leone/

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Fonte

Bürgi, Elisabeth (2015). Sustainable investment in land in the Global South: What would it require from a coherence perspective? The case of Sierra Leone. Questions of International Law, 21, pp. 17-37. QIL

Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

PeerReviewed