Sex as a source of power? Backlash against self-sexualizing women
Data(s) |
22/12/2014
|
---|---|
Resumo |
Although women are thought to possess sexual power, they risk social and economic penalties (i.e., backlash; Rudman, 1998) when they self-sexualize (i.e., assert their power; Cahoon & Edmonds, 1989; Glick, Larsen, Johnson, & Branstiter, 2005). Why? Drawing on the status incongruity hypothesis (SIH), which predicts backlash against powerful women because they challenge the gender hierarchy, we expected prejudice against self-sexualizing women to be explained by a dominance penalty rather than a communality deficit (Rudman, Moss-Racusin, Phelan, & Nauts, 2012). Two experiments supported this hypothesis, and Experiment 3 further showed that the dominance penalty was explained by ascribing power motives to self-sexualized women. These findings extend the SIH’s utility to the domain of self-sexualization and illuminate the scope of people’s discomfort with female power. Implications for the advancement of gender equality are discussed. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador |
Infanger, Martina; Rudman, Laurie A.; Sczesny, Sabine (2014). Sex as a source of power? Backlash against self-sexualizing women. Group processes and intergroup relations, 19(1), pp. 110-124. Sage 10.1177/1368430214558312 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430214558312> doi:10.7892/boris.63685 info:doi:10.1177/1368430214558312 urn:issn:1368-4302 |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
Sage |
Relação |
http://boris.unibe.ch/63685/ |
Direitos |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Fonte |
Infanger, Martina; Rudman, Laurie A.; Sczesny, Sabine (2014). Sex as a source of power? Backlash against self-sexualizing women. Group processes and intergroup relations, 19(1), pp. 110-124. Sage 10.1177/1368430214558312 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430214558312> |
Palavras-Chave | #150 Psychology |
Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion PeerReviewed |