"Sounds Funny? – Humor Effects of Phonological and Prosodic Figures of Speech"
Data(s) |
2014
|
---|---|
Identificador |
http://boris.unibe.ch/63250/1/Bohrn%20et%20al.%20%282014%29%2C%20Sounds%20funny_.pdf Lubrich, Oliver; Menninghaus, Winfried; Bohrn, Isabel; Altmann, Ulrike; Jacobs, Arthur (2014). "Sounds Funny? – Humor Effects of Phonological and Prosodic Figures of Speech". Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), pp. 71-76. American Psychological Association 10.1037/a0035309 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035309> doi:10.7892/boris.63250 info:doi:10.1037/a0035309 urn:issn:1931-3896 |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
American Psychological Association |
Relação |
http://boris.unibe.ch/63250/ |
Direitos |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Fonte |
Lubrich, Oliver; Menninghaus, Winfried; Bohrn, Isabel; Altmann, Ulrike; Jacobs, Arthur (2014). "Sounds Funny? – Humor Effects of Phonological and Prosodic Figures of Speech". Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), pp. 71-76. American Psychological Association 10.1037/a0035309 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035309> |
Palavras-Chave | #430 German & related languages #830 German & related literatures |
Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion PeerReviewed |
Resumo |
Whereas semantic, logical, and narrative features of verbal humor are well-researched, phonological and prosodic dimensions of verbal funniness are hardly explored. In a 2 × 2 design we varied rhyme and meter in humorous couplets. Rhyme and meter enhanced funniness ratings and supported faster processing. Rhyming couplets also elicited more intense and more positive affective responses, increased subjective comprehensibility and more accurate memory. The humor effect is attributed to special rhyme and meter features distinctive of humoristic poetry in several languages. Verses that employ these formal features make an artful use of typical poetic vices of amateurish poems written for birthday parties or other occasions. Their metrical patterning sounds “mechanical” rather than genuinely “poetic”; they also disregard rules for “good” rhymes. The processing of such verses is discussed in terms of a metacognitive integration of their poetically deviant features into an overall effect of processing ease. The study highlights the importance of nonsemantic rhetorical features in language processing. |
Formato |
application/pdf |