"Sounds Funny? – Humor Effects of Phonological and Prosodic Figures of Speech"


Autoria(s): Lubrich, Oliver; Menninghaus, Winfried; Bohrn, Isabel; Altmann, Ulrike; Jacobs, Arthur
Data(s)

2014

Identificador

http://boris.unibe.ch/63250/1/Bohrn%20et%20al.%20%282014%29%2C%20Sounds%20funny_.pdf

Lubrich, Oliver; Menninghaus, Winfried; Bohrn, Isabel; Altmann, Ulrike; Jacobs, Arthur (2014). "Sounds Funny? – Humor Effects of Phonological and Prosodic Figures of Speech". Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), pp. 71-76. American Psychological Association 10.1037/a0035309 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035309>

doi:10.7892/boris.63250

info:doi:10.1037/a0035309

urn:issn:1931-3896

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

American Psychological Association

Relação

http://boris.unibe.ch/63250/

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Fonte

Lubrich, Oliver; Menninghaus, Winfried; Bohrn, Isabel; Altmann, Ulrike; Jacobs, Arthur (2014). "Sounds Funny? – Humor Effects of Phonological and Prosodic Figures of Speech". Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), pp. 71-76. American Psychological Association 10.1037/a0035309 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035309>

Palavras-Chave #430 German & related languages #830 German & related literatures
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

PeerReviewed

Resumo

Whereas semantic, logical, and narrative features of verbal humor are well-researched, phonological and prosodic dimensions of verbal funniness are hardly explored. In a 2 × 2 design we varied rhyme and meter in humorous couplets. Rhyme and meter enhanced funniness ratings and supported faster processing. Rhyming couplets also elicited more intense and more positive affective responses, increased subjective comprehensibility and more accurate memory. The humor effect is attributed to special rhyme and meter features distinctive of humoristic poetry in several languages. Verses that employ these formal features make an artful use of typical poetic vices of amateurish poems written for birthday parties or other occasions. Their metrical patterning sounds “mechanical” rather than genuinely “poetic”; they also disregard rules for “good” rhymes. The processing of such verses is discussed in terms of a metacognitive integration of their poetically deviant features into an overall effect of processing ease. The study highlights the importance of nonsemantic rhetorical features in language processing.

Formato

application/pdf