Monte Carlo modeling of polarized light propagation: Stokes vs Jones - Part I


Autoria(s): Akarçay, H. Günhan; Hohmann, Ansgar; Kienle, Alwin; Frenz, Martin; Ricka, Jaroslav
Data(s)

2014

Resumo

This bipartite comparative study aims at inspecting the similarities and differences between the Jones and Stokes–Mueller formalisms when modeling polarized light propagation with numerical simulations of the Monte Carlo type. In this first part, we review the theoretical concepts that concern light propagation and detection with both pure and partially/totally unpolarized states. The latter case involving fluctuations, or “depolarizing effects,” is of special interest here: Jones and Stokes–Mueller are equally apt to model such effects and are expected to yield identical results. In a second, ensuing paper, empirical evidence is provided by means of numerical experiments, using both formalisms.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://boris.unibe.ch/62358/1/ao-53-31-7576.pdf

Akarçay, H. Günhan; Hohmann, Ansgar; Kienle, Alwin; Frenz, Martin; Ricka, Jaroslav (2014). Monte Carlo modeling of polarized light propagation: Stokes vs Jones - Part I. Applied optics, 53(31), pp. 7576-7585. Optical Society of America 10.1364/AO.53.007576 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.53.007576>

doi:10.7892/boris.62358

info:doi:10.1364/AO.53.007576

urn:issn:0003-6935

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Optical Society of America

Relação

http://boris.unibe.ch/62358/

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Fonte

Akarçay, H. Günhan; Hohmann, Ansgar; Kienle, Alwin; Frenz, Martin; Ricka, Jaroslav (2014). Monte Carlo modeling of polarized light propagation: Stokes vs Jones - Part I. Applied optics, 53(31), pp. 7576-7585. Optical Society of America 10.1364/AO.53.007576 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.53.007576>

Palavras-Chave #620 Engineering
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

PeerReviewed