Recurrent stroke predictors differ in medically treated patients with pathogenic vs other PFOs


Autoria(s): Thaler, David E.; Ruthazer, Robin; Weimar, Christian; Mas, Jean-Louis; Serena, Joaquín; Di Angelantonio, Emanuele; Papetti, Federica; Homma, Shunichi; Mattle, Heinrich P.; Nedeltchev, Krassen; Mono, Marie-Luise; Jaigobin, Cheryl; Michel, Patrik; Elkind, Mitchell S.V.; Di Tullio, Marco R.; Lutz, Jennifer S.; Griffith, John; Kent, David M.
Data(s)

13/06/2014

Resumo

OBJECTIVE: To examine predictors of stroke recurrence in patients with a high vs a low likelihood of having an incidental patent foramen ovale (PFO) as defined by the Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score.METHODS: Patients in the RoPE database with cryptogenic stroke (CS) and PFO were classified as having a probable PFO-related stroke (RoPE score of >6, n = 647) and others (RoPE score of </=6 points, n = 677). We tested 15 clinical, 5 radiologic, and 3 echocardiographic variables for associations with stroke recurrence using Cox survival models with component database as a stratification factor. An interaction with RoPE score was checked for the variables that were significant.RESULTS: Follow-up was available for 92%, 79%, and 57% at 1, 2, and 3 years. Overall, a higher recurrence risk was associated with an index TIA. For all other predictors, effects were significantly different in the 2 RoPE score categories. For the low RoPE score group, but not the high RoPE score group, older age and antiplatelet (vs warfarin) treatment predicted recurrence. Conversely, echocardiographic features (septal hypermobility and a small shunt) and a prior (clinical) stroke/TIA were significant predictors in the high but not low RoPE score group.CONCLUSION: Predictors of recurrence differ when PFO relatedness is classified by the RoPE score, suggesting that patients with CS and PFO form a heterogeneous group with different stroke mechanisms. Echocardiographic features were only associated with recurrence in the high RoPE score group.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://boris.unibe.ch/54210/1/Thaler-Neurology-2014.pdf

Thaler, David E.; Ruthazer, Robin; Weimar, Christian; Mas, Jean-Louis; Serena, Joaquín; Di Angelantonio, Emanuele; Papetti, Federica; Homma, Shunichi; Mattle, Heinrich P.; Nedeltchev, Krassen; Mono, Marie-Luise; Jaigobin, Cheryl; Michel, Patrik; Elkind, Mitchell S.V.; Di Tullio, Marco R.; Lutz, Jennifer S.; Griffith, John; Kent, David M. (2014). Recurrent stroke predictors differ in medically treated patients with pathogenic vs other PFOs. Neurology, 83(3), pp. 221-226. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000589 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000589>

doi:10.7892/boris.54210

info:doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000589

info:pmid:24928123

urn:issn:0028-3878

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Relação

http://boris.unibe.ch/54210/

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Fonte

Thaler, David E.; Ruthazer, Robin; Weimar, Christian; Mas, Jean-Louis; Serena, Joaquín; Di Angelantonio, Emanuele; Papetti, Federica; Homma, Shunichi; Mattle, Heinrich P.; Nedeltchev, Krassen; Mono, Marie-Luise; Jaigobin, Cheryl; Michel, Patrik; Elkind, Mitchell S.V.; Di Tullio, Marco R.; Lutz, Jennifer S.; Griffith, John; Kent, David M. (2014). Recurrent stroke predictors differ in medically treated patients with pathogenic vs other PFOs. Neurology, 83(3), pp. 221-226. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000589 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000589>

Palavras-Chave #610 Medicine & health
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

PeerReviewed